留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

采用Taguchi方法的铝合金拼焊板成形性能比较研究

伍杰 钱佑臣 赵晨阳

伍杰,钱佑臣,赵晨阳. 采用Taguchi方法的铝合金拼焊板成形性能比较研究[J]. 机械科学与技术,2022,41(9):1409-1413 doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20220149
引用本文: 伍杰,钱佑臣,赵晨阳. 采用Taguchi方法的铝合金拼焊板成形性能比较研究[J]. 机械科学与技术,2022,41(9):1409-1413 doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20220149
WU Jie, QIAN Youchen, ZHAO Chenyang. Comparative Study on Formability of Aluminum Alloy Tailor Welded Blanks using Taguchi Method[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2022, 41(9): 1409-1413. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20220149
Citation: WU Jie, QIAN Youchen, ZHAO Chenyang. Comparative Study on Formability of Aluminum Alloy Tailor Welded Blanks using Taguchi Method[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2022, 41(9): 1409-1413. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20220149

采用Taguchi方法的铝合金拼焊板成形性能比较研究

doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20220149
基金项目: 湖南省自然科学基金项目(2021JJ30205)、湖南省教育厅重点项目(19A122)、湖南省科技人才计划项目(2021RC1008)及湖南工学院项目(2019HY025)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    伍杰(1982−),副教授,博士,研究方向为拼焊板成形性能,jhydeyouxiang@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TG386

Comparative Study on Formability of Aluminum Alloy Tailor Welded Blanks using Taguchi Method

  • 摘要: 本论文研究了不同焊接方法、接触配置和厚度差异对铝合金拼焊板成形性能极限拱顶高度(Limiting dome height,LDH)值的影响,并采用Taguchi方法对3种影响因素进行了分析。结果表明:对于异种厚度的铝合金拼焊板,Face配置时的LDH值要小于Root配置时的LDH值,与焊接方法无关;激光焊接的LDH值要小于搅拌摩擦焊接的LDH值,与配置方式无关。对于同种厚度的铝合金拼焊板,LDH值都大于异种厚度时的LDH值,与配置方式无关;且Face配置时的LDH值仍然小于Root配置时的LDH值。厚度差异是影响铝合金拼焊板LDH值最主要的因素,接触配置对LDH值的影响较小,对LDH值影响最小的是焊接方法。
  • 图  1  采用不同方法制备的铝合金拼焊板及尺寸

    图  2  LDH实验示意图与设备

    图  3  ARAMIS的摄像头及数据处理系统

    图  4  两种配置示意图

    图  5  搅拌摩擦焊制备的异厚度AA5754铝合金拼焊板LDH实验时的断裂模式

    图  6  激光焊制备的异厚度AA5754铝合金拼焊板LDH实验时的断裂模式

    图  7  搅拌摩擦焊制备的磨削为相同厚度后的AA5754铝合金拼焊板LDH实验时的断裂模式

    图  8  激光焊接方法制备的磨削为相同厚度后的AA5754铝合金拼焊板LDH实验时的断裂模式

    表  1  AA5754铝合金各元素质量分数 %

    Bal. 0.4 0.5 2.6 ~ 3.2 0.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  AA5754铝合金力学性能

    抗拉强度/MPa 屈服强度/MPa 伸长率/% 硬度HV
    215 140 25 67.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  异厚度铝合金AA5754拼焊板LDH实验结果(3 mm vs 3.8 mm)

    配置类型 最大载荷/
    kN
    LDH /
    mm
    断裂位置和方向
    FSW face 配置 84.49 20.70 薄侧母材处,平行焊缝
    FSW root 配置 90.18 21.87 薄侧母材处,平行焊缝
    Laser face 配置 69.51 17.61 薄侧母材处,平行焊缝
    Laser root 配置 79.90 19.81 薄侧母材处,平行焊缝
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  同厚度铝合金AA5754拼焊板LDH实验结果

    配置类型 最大载荷/kN LDH/mm 断裂位置
    FSW face 配置 64.11 23.8 位于焊缝上
    FSW root 配置 65.29 24.26 位于焊缝上
    Laser face 配置 88.45 25.36 位于焊缝上
    Laser root配置 88.77 26.44 不位于焊缝上
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  L4(23)正交实验表和实验数据表

    实验
    编号
    焊接
    方法
    配置
    方法
    厚度 LDH/
    mm
    S/N
    1 激光焊接 Face 异厚 17.61 24.9152
    2 激光焊接 Root 等厚 26.44 28.4452
    3 搅拌摩擦焊接 Face 等厚 23.80 27.5315
    4 搅拌摩擦焊接 Root 异厚 21.87 26.7970
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  基于LDH值的S/N 信噪比一览表

    因子名称 效应等级 Max-Min 水准1 水准2
    焊接方法 3 0.4841 26.6802 27.1643
    配置方法 2 1.3977 26.2234 27.6211
    厚度差异 1 2.1323 25.8561 27.9884
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] SU Y, LI W Y, PATEL V, et al. Formability of an AA5083 aluminum alloy T-joint using SSFSW on both corners[J]. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2019, 34(15): 1737-1744 doi: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1669799
    [2] PATEL V, LI W Y, WANG G Q, et al. Friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloy combinations: state-of-the-art[J]. Metals, 2019, 9(3): 270 doi: 10.3390/met9030270
    [3] MERKLEIN M, JOHANNES M, LECHNER M, et al. A review on tailored blanks—Production, applications and evaluation[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2014, 214(2): 151-164 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.08.015
    [4] LI Y Z, ZAN Y N, WANG Q Z, et al. High-speed friction stir welding of T6-Treated B4Cp/6061Al composite[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(1): 67-74 doi: 10.1007/s40195-019-00932-0
    [5] LIU J, WANG A L, GAO H X, et al. Transition of failure mode in hot stamping of AA6082 tailor welded blanks[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2018, 257: 33-44 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.028
    [6] GAUTAM V, KUMAR A. Experimental and numerical studies on formability of tailor welded blanks of high strength steel[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, 29: 472-480 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.164
    [7] MA X D, GUAN Y P. Theoretical prediction and experimental investigation on formability of tailor-welded blanks[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2016, 26(1): 228-236 doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64108-0
    [8] NADIKUDI B K B, DAVIDSON M J, AKASAPU N R, et al. Formability analysis of dissimilar tailor welded blanks welded with different tool pin profiles[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25(6): 1787-1793 doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63784-0
    [9] SONG Y L, HUA L. Influences of thickness ratio of base sheets on formability of Tailor Welded Blanks[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 81: 730-735 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.068
    [10] BANDYOPADHYAY K, BASAK S, PANDA S K, et al. Use of stress based forming limit diagram to predict formability in two-stage forming of tailor welded blanks[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 67: 558-570
    [11] SAFDARIAN KOROUYEH R, MOSLEMI NAEINI H, TORKAMANY M J, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of thickness ratio effect on the formability of tailor welded blank[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, 51: 24-31
    [12] SAFDARIAN R. The effects of strength ratio on the forming limit diagram of tailor-welded blanks[J]. Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 2018, 45(1): 17-24
    [13] LEITAO C, ZHANG B K, PADMANABHAN R, et al. Influence of weld geometry and mismatch on formability of aluminium tailor welded blanks: numerical and experimental analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2011, 16(8): 662-668 doi: 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000055
    [14] HOVANSKI Y, CARSLEY J, CARLSON B, et al. Comparing laser welding technologies with friction stir welding for production of Aluminum tailor-welded blanks[J]. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 2014, 7(3): 537-544 doi: 10.4271/2014-01-0791
    [15] MILES M P, NELSON T W, DECKER B J. Formability and strength of friction-stir-welded aluminum sheets[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2004, 35(11): 3461-3468 doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0183-8
    [16] SETO A, YAMAMOTO T, NIWA T. Influences of loading direction and thickness ratio on fatigue properties of tailored welded blanks[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2007, 29(4): 729-737 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.06.008
    [17] SHAKERI H R, BUSTE A, WORSWICK M J, et al. Study of damage initiation and fracture in aluminum tailor welded blanks made via different welding techniques[J]. Journal of Light Metals, 2002, 2(2): 95-110 doi: 10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00028-7
    [18] 伍杰, 李理, 毛祖莉, 等. 轻量化汽车用拼焊板冲压成形性能研究现状与展望[J]. 焊接技术, 2019, 48(10): 1-5 doi: 10.13846/j.cnki.cn12-1070/tg.2019.10.001

    WU J, LI L, MAO Z L, et al. Research status and prospect of the stamping formability of tailor welded blanks for the application of automobile lightweight[J]. Welding Technology, 2019, 48(10): 1-5 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13846/j.cnki.cn12-1070/tg.2019.10.001
    [19] 刘儒军, 周朝辉, 杜曙威. DOE在高频电流感应钎焊焊接工艺参数优化中的应用[J]. 焊接技术, 2014, 43(9): 33-36 doi: 10.13846/j.cnki.cn12-1070/tg.2014.09.010

    LIU R J, ZHOU Z H, DU S W. Application of DOE to the parameters optimization of the high frequency current induction brazing technology[J]. Welding Technology, 2014, 43(9): 33-36 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13846/j.cnki.cn12-1070/tg.2014.09.010
    [20] 周里群, 彭宜昌, 毛昭明, 等. 基于Taguchi方法的镍涂层薄板冲压工艺参数研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2015, 34(7): 1054-1058 doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2015.0716

    ZHOU L Q, PENG Y C, MAO Z M, et al. Research on process parameters in deep drawing of electroplating nickel coating sheet based on taguchi method[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 34(7): 1054-1058 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2015.0716
    [21] SHUNMUGASUNDARAM M, PRAVEEN KUMAR A, PONRAJ SANKAR L, et al. Optimization of process parameters of friction stir welded dissimilar AA6063 and AA5052 aluminum alloys by Taguchi technique[J]. Materials Today:Proceedings, 2020, 27: 871-876 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.122
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  126
  • HTML全文浏览量:  94
  • PDF下载量:  16
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-20
  • 刊出日期:  2022-09-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回