蠕变时效成形工艺参数多目标优化

甘忠; 张尧; 冯爽; 王亚茹; 梁森森

doi:10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2017.0722

蠕变时效成形工艺参数多目标优化

doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2017.0722

1.
西北工业大学机电学院, 西安 710072

详细信息

作者简介:
甘忠(1969-),副教授,博士,研究方向为精密钣金成形技术、飞机装配与连接技术等,ganzh@nwpu.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 169
- HTML全文浏览量: 21
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-04-06
- 刊出日期: 2017-07-05

Multi-objective Optimization of Processing Parameters for Creep Aging Forming via Particle Swarm Algorithm

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

摘要

摘要: 提出了一种综合运用试验设计、响应曲面法及多目标优化的工艺参数优化方法，以成形效率和时效后材料的屈服强度为试验指标，以时效温度、时效时间和应力为试验变量，按Box-Behnken试验设计方案进行试验；利用试验结果构造试验指标和试验变量间的响应曲面并对其分析；结合响应曲面建立多目标优化模型；运用基于动态目标加权的具有量子行为的粒子群算法得到Pareto最优解集；提出一种最小归一化距离选解法，从非劣解集中选出最优解，得到综合最优工艺解187.9℃、6.42 h、250 MPa。按优化前后的工艺参数进行单曲率蠕变时效成形试验，相比优化前，成形效率由14.0%提高到19.4%，屈服强度由442.354 MPa提高到451.786 MPa，两个目标同时得到了优化，验证了工艺参数优化方法的有效性。
- 蠕变时效成形 /
- Box-Behnken试验设计 /
- 响应曲面 /
- 粒子群算法 /
- 多目标优化
Abstract: An Optimization method for processing parameters is presented, which is a comprehensive applying for experimental design, response surface method and multi-objective optimization. Taking the forming efficiency and the yield strength as the optimization indexes, aging temperature, aging time and stress as the optimization variables, the experiments are conducted according to Box-Behnken design principle. Then the response surface models are constructed based on the experimental results, and the multi-objective optimization model is further established. The Dynamic weighted aggregation based on the quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm is introduced to provide the designer with a set of Pareto optimal solutions, a minimum normalized distance method has been presented to select the optimal solution and the corresponding processing parameters (187.9℃, 6.42 h, 250 MPa) are the comprehensive optimal parameters. Tension of creep aging have been carried out with the parameters pre-and post-optimization, the results show that the forming efficiency increase from 14.0% to 19.4% and the yield strength increase from 442.354 MPa to 451.786 MPa, which prove the present processing parameter optimization method for creep aging forming is effective.
- creep aging forming /
- box-behnken design /
- response surface method /
- particle swarm optimization /
- multi-objective optimization

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	Munroe J, Wilkins K, Gruber M. Integral airframe structures (IAS)-validated feasibility study of integrally stiffened metallic fuselage panels for reducing manufacturing costs[R]. NASA/CR-2000-209337, 2000
[2]	《航空制造工程手册会》总编委会.航空制造工程手册-飞机钣金工艺[M].北京:航空工业出版社,1992:397-400 Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology Manual Ehief Editorial Committee. Aeronautical manufacturing technology manual-sheet metal forming[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 1992:397-400(in Chinese)
[3]	曾元松,黄遐.大型整体壁板成形技术[J].航空学报,2008,29(3):721-727 Zeng Y S, Huang X. Forming technologies of large integral panel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008,29(3):721-727(in Chinese)
[4]	常荣福.飞机钣金零件制造技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1992:94-117 Chang R F. Sheet metal forming technology[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 1992:94-117(in Chinese)
[5]	Sallah M, Peddieson Jr J, Foroudastan S. A mathematical model of autoclave age forming[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1991,28(1-2):211-219
[6]	Idem K, Peddieson J. Simulation of the age forming process[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2005,127(1):165-172
[7]	Holman M C. Autoclave age forming large aluminum aircraft panels[J]. Journal of Mechanical Working Technology, 1989,20:477-488
[8]	Li H Y, Lu X C. Springback and tensile strength of 2A97 aluminum alloy during age forming[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015,25(4):1043-1049
[9]	Xiao J J, Li D S, Li X Q, et al. Process parameters optimization of Ti-6Al-4V alloy sheet during hot stretch-creep forming[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015,25(2):420-428
[10]	孙光永,李光耀,陈涛,等.多目标粒子群优化算法在薄板冲压成形中的应用[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(5):153-159 Sun G Y, Li G Y, Chen T, et al. Application of multi-objective particle swarm optimization in sheet metal forming[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009,45(5):153-159(in Chinese)
[11]	Zhan L H, Li Y G, Huang M H. Effects of process parameters on mechanical properties and microstructures of creep aged 2124 aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014,24(7):2232-2238
[12]	公茂果,焦李成,杨咚咚,等.于进化多目标优化算法研究[J].软件学报,2009,20(2):271-289 Gong M G, Jiao L C, Yang D D, et al. Research on evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms[J]. Journal of Software, 2009,20(2):271-289(in Chinese)
[13]	Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer[C]//Proceedings of 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. Anchorage, AK:IEEE, 1998:69-73
[14]	凌海风,周献中,江勋林,等.基于多目标粒子群优化算法的装备维修任务分配[J].计算机应用研究,2012,29(6):2090-2092 Ling H F, Zhou X Z, Jiang X L, et al. Study on equipment maintenance task assignment based on multi-objectives particle swarm optimization[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2012,29(6):2090-2092(in Chinese)
[15]	Jin Y C, Olhofer M, Sendho B. Dynamic weighted aggregation for evolutionary multi-objective optimization:why does it work and how?[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann, 2001:1042-1049
[16]	Engelbrecht A P.计算群体智能基础[M].谭营,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2009:27-84 Engelbrecht A P. Fundamentals of computational swarm intelligence[M]. Tan Y, Trans. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2009:27-84(in Chinese)