留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

民用飞机机翼油箱超压损坏事件风险评估

李东明 孙有朝 李龙彪

李东明, 孙有朝, 李龙彪. 民用飞机机翼油箱超压损坏事件风险评估[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2016, 35(4): 636-640. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.0425
引用本文: 李东明, 孙有朝, 李龙彪. 民用飞机机翼油箱超压损坏事件风险评估[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2016, 35(4): 636-640. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.0425
Li Dongming, Sun Youchao, Li Longbiao. Risk Assessment on Wing Fuel Tank Overpressure Damage Event of Civil Airplanes[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 636-640. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.0425
Citation: Li Dongming, Sun Youchao, Li Longbiao. Risk Assessment on Wing Fuel Tank Overpressure Damage Event of Civil Airplanes[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 636-640. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.0425

民用飞机机翼油箱超压损坏事件风险评估

doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.0425
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金委员会与中国民用航空局民航联合研究基金项目(U1333119,60979019,60572171)及中国民用航空局科技计划项目(MHRD201123,MHRD200817, MHRD200908)资助

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李东明(1959-),高级工程师,研究方向为适航技术与管理,llb451@nuaa.edu.cn

Risk Assessment on Wing Fuel Tank Overpressure Damage Event of Civil Airplanes

  • 摘要: 建立了民用运输类飞机持续适航阶段的风险评估方法,给出了事件风险类型的分类、事件后果严重度等级的划分、事件概率水平的确定方法,通过风险矩阵和冈斯顿方法分别确定事件风险水平和高风险事件纠正措施的实施时间。采用所建立的风险评估方法对某型飞机机翼油箱超压损坏的危险事件进行了风险评估,确定了该事件的风险水平,给出了适当的纠正措施。
  • [1] Janic M. An assessment of risk and safety in civil aviation[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2000,6(1):43-50
    [2] Bahr N J. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach[M]. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1997
    [3] 韦艺,陈新锋.使用困难报告安全性风险评估方法研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2011,29(2):42-46 Wei Y, Chen X F. Research of safety risk evaluation for service difficulty report[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2011,29(2):42-46 (in Chinese)
    [4] 邱仁田,尹小贝,白福利.航空安全风险管理模式探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(2):118-120 Qiu R T, Yin X B, Bai F L. Discussion on the aviation safety risk management mode based on the problem management[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007,3(2):118-120 (in Chinese)
    [5] 曾亮.多层次模糊评估方法在民航不安全事件风险评估中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(1):131-138 Zeng L. Application of multi-layer fuzzy evaluation method to risk assessment in civil aviation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008,18(1):131-138 (in Chinese)
    [6] 杨其其,魏光兴.空管不安全事件危险等级的量化评估方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2006,41(6):753-757 Yang C Q, Wei G X. Quantitative assessment method for severity classification of air traffic control[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006,41(6):753-757 (in Chinese)
    [7] 葛志浩,徐浩军,刘琳,等.飞行事故概率模型与风险评估方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(2):162-165 Ge Z H, Xu H J, Liu L, et al. Probability model for flight accidents and risk assessment method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008,18(2):162-165 (in Chinese)
    [8] 王冠茹,孙有朝,李龙彪,等.民机持续适航事件风险评估流程研究[J].民用飞机设计与研究,2012,(3):29-32,72 Wang G R, Sun Y C, Li L B, et al. Occurrence risk analysis process and methods during continuing airworthiness of civil aircraft[J]. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2012,(3):29-32,72 (in Chinese)
    [9] EASA. CS-25 Amendment 12-AMC 25.1309. Systems Analysis & Design[S]. Cologne: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2012
    [10] US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Advisory circular 25.1309-1A: system design and analysis[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 1988
    [11] SAE. ARP4754: Certification considerations for highly integrated or complex aircraft systems[S]. Detroit: SAE, 1996
    [12] SAE. ARP4761: Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment[S]. Detroit: SAE, 1996
    [13] SAE. ARP5150: Safety Assessment of Transport Airplanes in Commercial Service[S]. Detroit: SAE, 2003
    [14] SAE. ARP5151: Safety Assessment of General Aviation Airplanes and Rotorcraft in Commercial Service[S]. Detroit: SAE, 2006
    [15] EASA. On acceptable means of compliance and guidance material for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and applications, as well as for the certification and production organizations ("AMC and GM to Part 21")[S]. Cologne: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2012
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  171
  • HTML全文浏览量:  31
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-05-27
  • 刊出日期:  2016-04-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回