One-step Fabrication for Superhydrophobic Surface with Wire Electrical Discharge Machining
-
摘要: 超疏水表面具有自清洁、减霜防冰等优良特性,在航空航天、武器装备等领域具有广泛的应用前景。针对传统超疏水表面制备工艺复杂、成本高、耐磨性差等问题,提出电火花线切割加工单步制备主级表面织构和次级放电凹坑/凸起表面形貌形成多级分层结构获得超疏水表面的新方法,主要研究内容包括:研究特定参数下线切割加工工件表面特性,获得工件加工平面的表观接触角与微观形貌;开展3种表面织构的尺寸设计,预测工件表面的实际尺寸;建立接触角仿真模型并进行仿真,分析表面织构类型和尺寸对接触角的影响规律;开展工件表面接触角的实验研究,实验结果表明:工件表面的最大接触角为152.5°,仿真接触角与实验值的相对误差低于6%。Abstract: Superhydrophobic surface has many excellent properties, such as self-cleaning, antifreeze. It has a wide application prospect in aerospace, weapon equipment and other fields. In order to solve the problem that the traditional superhydrophobic surface has high-cost and poor-wear resistance in the complex preparation process, a new method of one-step fabrication and multi-level hierarchical structure formation of discharge pits / bulges surface morphology with wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) is proposed. We study the surface characteristics of the workpiece processed with WEDM under specific parameters, obtain its surface contact angle (CA) and microstructure. Then, we design the dimensions of three different surface textures and predict their actual sizes. We also establish the CA simulation model, carry out the simulations and analyze the influence of surface texture type and size on the CA. Finally, we do experiments on CAs. The experimental results show that the maximum contact angle is 152.5° and that the error between predicted CA and experimental values is less than 6%.
-
表 1 3种表面织构尺寸设计表
Table 1. Table of three surface texture size design
序号 三角形表面织构 梯形表面织构 矩形表面织构 la/mm ha/mm lb/mm θb/(°) xb/mm lc/mm Dc/mm hc/mm 1 0.7 0.8 0.8 60 0.8 0.25 0.8 0.4 2 0.6 0.72 0.8 60 1.0 0.25 1.0 0.4 3 0.6 0.58 1.0 60 1.0 0.25 1.2 0.4 4 0.6 0.44 1.0 60 1.2 0.4 0.8 0.4 5 0.6 0.3 1.2 60 1.2 0.4 1.0 0.4 6 0.7 0.3 1.2 45 1.2 表 2 3种表面织构尺寸预测表
Table 2. Table of three surface texture size prediction
序号 三角形表面织构 梯形表面织构 矩形表面织构 la/mm ha/mm lb/mm θb/(°) xb/mm lc/mm Dc/mm hc/mm 1 0.7 0.8 0.8 60 0.8 0.25 0.8 0.4 2 0.6 0.72 0.8 60 1.0 0.25 1.0 0.4 3 0.6 0.58 1.0 60 1.0 0.25 1.2 0.4 4 0.6 0.44 1.0 60 1.2 0.4 0.8 0.4 5 0.6 0.3 1.2 60 1.2 0.4 1.0 0.4 6 0.7 0.3 1.2 45 1.2 表 3 3种表面织构实际几何尺寸与预测尺寸相对误差
Table 3. Relative error between the actual geometry size and the predicted size of three surface textures
序号 三角形表面织构 梯形表面织构 矩形表面织构 ha/mm ha*/mm |Δh|/mm θb/(°) θb*/(°) Δθ/(°) lc/mm lc*/mm |Δlc|/mm 1 0.65 0.46 0.19 55 55.5 0.5 0.23 0.23 0 2 0.46 0.36 0.10 55 55 0 0.23 0.23 0 3 0.37 0.34 0.03 55 55.5 0.5 0.23 0.22 0.01 4 0.27 0.26 0.01 55 55 0 0.42 0.41 0.01 5 0.17 0.19 0.02 55 55 0 0.42 0.43 0.01 6 0.18 0.22 0.04 45 45 0 -
[1] AVRǍMESCU R E, GHICA M V, DINU-PÎRVU C, et al. Superhydrophobic natural and artificial surfaces-a structural approach[J]. Materials, 2018, 11(5): 866. doi: 10.3390/ma11050866 [2] LIAO R J, LI C, YUAN Y, et al. Anti-icing performance of ZnO/SiO2/PTFE sandwich-nanostructure superhydrophobic film on glass prepared via RF magnetron sputtering[J]. Materials Letters, 2017, 206: 109-112. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.06.127 [3] GUO F, WEN Q Y, PENG Y B, et al. Multifunctional hollow superhydrophobic SiO2 microspheres with robust and self-cleaning and separation of oil/water emulsions properties[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 494: 54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.070 [4] BIXLER G D, BHUSHAN B. Fluid drag reduction and efficient self-cleaning with rice leaf and butterfly wing bioinspired surfaces[J]. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(17): 7685-7710. doi: 10.1039/c3nr01710a [5] ZHANG X, SHI F, NIU J, et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2008, 18(6): 621-633. doi: 10.1039/B711226B [6] 吴春亚, 黄俊杰, 李曦光, 等. 金属基超疏水表面的制备技术研究新进展[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2021, 53(7): 1-19, doi: 10.11918/202005144.WU C Y, HUANG J J, LI X G, et al. New progress in preparation of metal based superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021, 53(7): 1-19, doi: 10.11918/202005144.(in Chinese) [7] ZHENG X L, WENG J B, HU B H, et al. Fabrication of a stable superhydrophobic film constructed by poly(vinylpyrrolidone)/poly(urushiol)-CuS through layer-by-layer assembly[J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 130(3): 1054-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.032 [8] YEGANEH M, OMIDI M, ESKANDARI M. Superhydrophobic surface of AZ31 Alloy fabricated by chemical treatment in the NiSO4solution[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27(8): 3951-3960. doi: 10.1007/s11665-018-3479-3 [9] MOHAMED M E, ABD-EL-NABEY B A. Facile and eco-friendly method for fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on copper metal[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2020, 9(6): 061006, doi: 10.1149/2162-8777/ab9dc7. [10] CREDI C, PINTOSSI C, BIANCHI C L, et al. Combining stereolithography and replica molding: on the way to superhydrophobic polymeric devices for photovoltaics[J]. Materials & Design, 2017, 133: 143-153. [11] ZHU Y, HE Y, ZHANG J F, et al. Preparation of large-scale, durable, superhydrophobic PTFE films using rough glass templates[J]. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2017, 49(13): 1422-1430. doi: 10.1002/sia.6273 [12] ŽEMAITIS A, MIMIDIS A, PAPADOPOULOS A, et al. Controlling the wettability of stainless steel from highly-hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic by femtosecond laser-induced ripples and nanospikes[J]. RSC Advances, 2020, 10(62): 37956-37961. doi: 10.1039/D0RA05665K [13] QIU R X, LI C, TONG W, et al. High-speed wire electrical discharge machining to create superhydrophobic surfaces for magnesium alloys with high corrosion and wear resistance[J]. Materials and Corrosion, 2020, 71(10): 1711-1720. doi: 10.1002/maco.202011807 [14] 于福鑫. 基于电火花加工方法的铍铜材料超疏水表面减阻性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019.YU F X. Study on drag reduction performance of superhydrophobic surface machined by EDM of beryllium copper alloy[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese) [15] VIJAYABHASKAR S, RAJMOHAN T. Experimental investigation and optimization of machining parameters in WEDM of Nano-SiC particles reinforced magnesium matrix composites[J]. Silicon, 2019, 11(4): 1701-1716. doi: 10.1007/s12633-017-9676-0 [16] BORMASHENKO E. Progress in understanding wetting transitions on rough surfaces[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2015, 222: 92-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.009 [17] PAPADOPOULOS P, MAMMEN L, DENG X, et al. How superhydrophobicity breaks down[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(9): 3254-3258. [18] BANERJEE S, DIONYSIOU D D, PILLAI S C. Self-cleaning applications of TiO2 by photo-induced hydrophilicity and photocatalysis[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015, 176-177: 396-428. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.03.058 [19] ISHFAQ K, ANWAR S, ALI M A, et al. Optimization of WEDM for precise machining of novel developed Al6061-7.5% SiC squeeze-casted composite[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 111(7-8): 2031-2049. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-06218-5 [20] 梅宇超. 提高电火花线切割加工精度的措施研究[J]. 机电信息, 2019(32): 114-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXX201932066.htmMEI Y C. Research on the measures to improve the machining accuracy of WEDM[J]. Mechanical and Electrical Information, 2019(32): 114-115. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXX201932066.htm