Structural Design and Performance Research of New Type Double-rod Piston Magnetorheological Shimmy Damper
-
摘要: 被动油液式减摆器对摆振激励的改变不能实时响应,传统磁流变(Magnetorheological,MR)减摆器存在引线复杂、不利于散热、输出阻尼力较低等方面的不足。针对上述问题,为了有效抑制飞机前轮摆振,提出一种新型压差式结构的双出杆活塞式MR减摆器,内置固定双线圈,内筒两端与磁芯和导磁环形成对称双阻尼通道;根据减摆需求完成结构设计,利用ANSYS/Emag 2020 R1对MR减摆器进行磁场仿真,仿真结果验证理论分析的合理性;最后进行力学性能分析。结果表明:设计的MR减摆器输出阻尼力满足减摆需求,动力可调系数较大,示功曲线近似于椭圆。所采用的研究思路对今后飞机起落架MR减摆器的研发具有一定指导意义。Abstract: Passive oil-type shimmy dampers cannot respond to the change of shimmy excitation in real time. Traditional magnetorheological (MR) shimmy dampers have shortages such as complicated lead wires, unfavorable heat dissipation and low output damping force. For the above problems, a new differential pressure structure type of double-rod piston MR shimmy damper, applicable to suppress the shimmy of the nose wheel of the aircraft, was presented. It has the fixed double coils, and the two ends of the inner cylinder forming a symmetrical double damping channels with a magnetic core and a magnetic guide ring. According to the requirements of shimmy reduction, the structure design was completed, and the ANSYS/Emag 2020 R1 was used to simulate the magnetic field of the MR damper, which verified the rationality of the theoretical analysis. Finally, the mechanical properties were analyzed. The results show that the output damping force of the designed MR shimmy damper meets the demand of damping, the dynamic adjustable coefficient is large, and the indicator curve is approximate to ellipse. The design idea adopted in this paper has certain guiding significance for the future research of MR shimmy damper of the aircraft landing gear.
-
表 1 不同工况下的理论阻尼力
Table 1. Theoretical damping force under differentoperating conditions
序号 振幅/mm 频率/Hz 理论阻尼力/kN 1 2.8 3 1.23 2 1.4 7 1.44 3 0.7 11 1.13 4 0.7 15 1.54 表 2 结构尺寸参数
Table 2. Structural dimension parameter
参数 数值/mm 参数 数值/mm R0 5 Lm 10 R1 11.5 tm 0.8 R2 18.5 Ln 42 R3 22 tn 1 R4 24.5 Lc 12 R5 13 Wc 5.5 Lg 7 表 3 不同电流下MRF屈服强度
Table 3. MRF yield strength under different currents
电流/A 阻尼通道$\bar {{B} }$/T τy/kPa 0.25 0.2415 10.26481 0.50 0.4375 23.43169 0.75 0.5475 30.70975 1.00 0.6105 34.52339 1.25 0.6515 36.81403 表 4 系数c数值
Table 4. Numerical values of the coefficient c
v/(m·s−1) I/A 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 0 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 0.04 2.16 2.11 2.10 2.10 2.10 0.08 2.23 2.15 2.13 2.12 2.12 0.12 2.30 2.18 2.16 2.15 2.15 0.16 2.35 2.22 2.19 2.17 2.17 0.20 2.40 2.25 2.21 2.20 2.19 0.24 2.44 2.27 2.23 2.22 2.21 -
[1] HAN C, KIM B G, CHOI S B. Design of a new magnetorheological damper based on passive oleo-pneumatic landing gear[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 55(6): 2510-2520. doi: 10.2514/1.C034996 [2] HAN C, KANG B H, CHOI S B, et al. Control of landing efficiency of an aircraft landing gear system with magnetorheological dampers[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(5): 1980-1986. doi: 10.2514/1.C035298 [3] DONG Z Z, FENG Z M, CHEN Y H, et al. Design and multiobjective optimization of magnetorheological damper considering the consistency of magnetic flux density[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2020, 2020: 7050356. [4] KUBÍK M, MACHÁCEK O, STRECKER Z, et al. Design and testing of magnetorheological valve with fast force response time and great dynamic force range[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2017, 26(4): 047002. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aa6066 [5] 胡国良, 张佳伟. 磁流变阻尼器结构优化设计研究现状[J]. 机床与液压, 2019, 47(1): 145-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2019.01.033HU G L, ZHANG J W. State of the art review on structural optimization design of magnetorheological damper[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2019, 47(1): 145-150. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2019.01.033 [6] ZHU X C, JING X J, CHENG L. Magnetorheological fluid dampers: A review on structure design and analysis[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2012, 23(8): 839-873. doi: 10.1177/1045389X12436735 [7] GOŁDASZ J, SAPIŃSKI B. Insight into magnetorheological shock absorbers[M]. Cham: Springer, 2015 [8] 《飞机设计手册》总编委会. 飞机设计手册. 第14册, 起飞着陆系统设计[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2002Editorial Committee of Aircraft Design Manual. Aircraft design handbook. Volume 14, Take-off and landing system design[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2002. (in Chinese) [9] 祝世兴, 杨云鹏. 飞机起落架磁流变减摆器的设计流程[J]. 液压与气动, 2016(10): 67-74. doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2016.010.013ZHU S X, YANG Y P. Design process of aircraft landing gear shimmy dampers based on magnetorheological fluid[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2016(10): 67-74. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2016.010.013 [10] 祝世兴, 王国卫. 线圈外置式磁流变减摆器设计与实验研究[J]. 机床与液压, 2019, 47(1): 12-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2019.01.004ZHU S X, WANG G W. Design and experimental research of external coil type magnetorheological shimmy damper[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2019, 47(1): 12-17. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2019.01.004 [11] 刘秀. 双线圈内置式磁流变减摆器设计研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2018LIU X. Design and research of dual-coil built-in magnetorheological damper[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2018. (in Chinese) [12] 李忠献, 徐龙河. 新型磁流变阻尼器及半主动控制设计理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012: 29-36LI Z X, XU L H. New-type Magnetorheological damper and semi-active control design theory[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012. (in Chinese) [13] 李泉凤. 电磁场数值计算与电磁铁设计[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2002LI Q F. Numerical calculation of electromagnetic field and design of electromagnet magnetization curve[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2002. (in Chinese) [14] NGUYEN Q H, CHOI S B. Optimal design of a vehicle magnetorheological damper considering the damping force and dynamic range[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2009, 18(1): 015013. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/18/1/015013 [15] 周云, 谭平. 磁流变阻尼控制理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007ZHOU Y, TAN P. Theory and technology of magnetorheological damping control[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007. (in Chinese)