Numerical Analysis of Wind Induced Vibration of Supporting Type Tubular Busbars
-
摘要: 支持式管母线在野外长期服役期间经常遇到风致振动的问题。本文采用数值模拟方法,对支持式管母线抗强风振动特性及阻尼对振动的影响进行了分析。计算了管母线简化模型的固有频率和振型以及受到风荷载作用时的变形特征,采用静态算法和动态算法对比分析了阻尼线对管母线抗风振动所起到的作用。进而对支持式管母线全尺寸结构在风荷载作用下的动态特性进行了计算,分析了阻尼线及管母线结构阻尼对抗风振动的影响。结果表明,理想条件下,阻尼线能有效减小受风载后管母线简化模型的振动变形,但在真实全尺寸管母线结构中,由结构连接等形成的结构阻尼比阻尼线对管母线抗风振动的效果更为显著,有无阻尼线对真实结构振动特性不产生明显区别。Abstract: Supporting type tubular busbars often encounter wind-induced vibration problems during long-term service in the field. Numerical simulation methods are used to analyze the wind vibration characteristics of the supported tubular busbar and the influence of damping on vibration. The natural frequency and mode shape of the busbar under ideal conditions and the deformation characteristics when subjected to wind load are calculated. The static algorithm and the dynamic algorithm are respectively used analyze the effect of the damping line on the wind resistance of the busbar. Furthermore, the dynamic characteristics of the full-scale supported tubular busbar structure under wind load are calculated, and the influence of the damping line and the busbar structural damping against wind vibration is analyzed. The results show that in an ideal state, the damping line can effectively reduce the deformation of the busbar after wind load. However, in the real full-size tubular bus structure, the structural damping formed by structural connections is more significant than the effect of the damping wire on the wind vibration of the busbar.
-
Key words:
- tubular busbar /
- damping wire /
- natural frequency /
- wind induced vibration
-
表 1 材料参数表
Table 1. Material parameters
材料 部件 弹性模量E/MPa 泊松比 密度ρ/(kg·m-3) 铝合金 金具 72 000 0.3 2 800 阻尼线 100 0.3 2 800 金具托架、耳片 72 000 0.3 2 800 钢Q235 底部支架、横梁、管母线 210 000 0.3 7 800 陶瓷 支柱绝缘子 110 000 0.3 6 000 绝缘子 下法兰盘 173 000 0.3 3 440 法兰盘 上法兰盘 173 000 0.3 2 340 -
[1] 孙启林. 变电站架构与设备体系抗震性能研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2018.SUN Q L. Study on seismic behaviour of structures and equipments in substation[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2018. (in Chinese) [2] SUN Q L, YUAN G L, HUANG Y E, et al. Structural behavior of supported tubular bus structure in substations under seismic loading[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 174: 861-872. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.077 [3] 谢强, 朱瑞元. 汶川地震中支持式管型母线破坏机理分析[J]. 电力建设, 2010, 31(3): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLJS201003003.htmXIE Q, ZHU R Y. Seismic failure analysis of support type pipe bus in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2010, 31(3): 8-12. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLJS201003003.htm [4] 郝小卫. 支持式管母线微风振动的防治[J]. 山西电力, 2003(3): 5-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ELEC200303001.htmHAO X W. Prevention and cure of gentle breeze syntony about sustained tubate generatrix[J]. Shanxi Electric Power, 2003(3): 5-6. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ELEC200303001.htm [5] 傅增茂. 从龙门变电所看铝管母线的微风振动及其消减[J]. 吉林电力技术, 1986(5): 31-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLDJ198605008.htmFU Z M. Gentle breeze vibration and reduction of tubular busbar at Longmen substation[J]. Jilin Electric Power, 1986(5): 31-33. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLDJ198605008.htm [6] 王海菠, 程永锋, 卢智成, 等. 管母支撑滑动金具耦联体系抗震性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(31): 12843-12848. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS202031024.htmWANG H B, CHENG Y F, LU Z C, et al. Seismic performance of the coupling system of sliding fitting supported by tube[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(31): 12843-12848. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS202031024.htm [7] 罗宏建, 陈兴涛, 张杰, 等. GIS设备有限元结构分析研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2019, 38(12): 99-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJDL201912017.htmLUO H J, CHEN X T, ZHANG J, et al. Finite element structural analysis of GIS equipment[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2019, 38(12): 99-106. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJDL201912017.htm [8] 赖炜煌, 谢强, 李晓璇, 等. 悬吊式滤波电容器单体与耦联状态抗震性能对比分析[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2020, 41(3): 71-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLDY202003014.htmLAI W H, XIE Q, LI X X, et al. Comparative analyses on seismic performance of suspended capacitor in standalone and coupled states[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2020, 41(3): 71-78. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLDY202003014.htm [9] 赖炜煌, 谢强, 李晓璇, 等. 不同结构型式直流滤波器回路抗震性能对比分析[J]. 高压电器, 2021, 57(7): 135-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYDQ202107019.htmLAI W H, XIE Q, LI X X, et al. Comparative analysis on seismic performance of dc filter coupling loops with different structural forms[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2021, 57(7): 135-143. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYDQ202107019.htm [10] 王林. 500KV管母线振动测试与分析[D]. 保定: 华北电力大学, 2012.WANG L. Test and analysis on the vibration of 500KV tubular busbar[D]. Baoding: North China Electric Power University, 2012. (in Chinese) [11] ADAMI H, BATCH B A. Aeolian vibrations of tubular busbars in outdoor substations[J]. Electra, 1981, 75: 99-120. [12] 王聪. GIS管母线力学特性的有限元分析与研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014.WANG C. Finite element analysis and research for mechanical property of GIS busbar[D]. Ji'nan: Shandong University, 2014. (in Chinese) [13] 解伟. 管型母线的挠度、模态分析及工程安全应用[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2016.XIE W. Analysis of deflection and modal of tubular bus-bar and application to safety engineering[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2016. (in Chinese) [14] 赵杰. 1000kV特高压变电站塔架抗风性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2019.ZHAO J. Study on wind resistance of 1 000 kV substation tower[D]. Harbin: Heilongjiang University, 2019. (in Chinese) [15] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50009-2012建筑结构荷载规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社准会2012.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. GB 50009-2012 Load code for the design of building structures[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012. (in Chinese)