Orthogonal Optimization Design of Direct Current Section of Diesel Engine Helical Intake Port
-
摘要: 通过构建YN33柴油机气道-气门-燃烧室计算流体动力学(Computational fluid dynamics,CFD)模型,以涡流比和进气量作为评价指标,对柴油机螺旋进气道直流段的直流段上偏角、直流段下偏角、直流段长度这3个关键结构参数进行正交优化设计。结果表明:直流段长度对缸内涡流比、进气量的影响最大;直流段上偏角、直流段下偏角及直流段长度3个参数,分别取值82°、85°和69 mm时,可使缸内涡流比和进气量相对原机分别提高26.02%与5.50%;在此条件下,放热率峰值和累积放热量与原机相比分别增加了4.92%和8.29%。Abstract: Based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for YN33 diesel engine, three key structural parameters of helical intake port direct current (DC) section are optimized by using the orthogonal optimization design. Those three parameters are the upper deflection angle of DC section, the lower deflection angle of DC section and the length of DC section. In addition, swirl ratio and air input are used as evaluation indexes. The results show that the length of the DC section has the greatest influence on the swirl ratio and air input. When the upper deflection angle of the DC section, the lower deflection angle of the DC section and the length of the DC section are 82°, 85° and 69 mm, respectively, the in-cylinder swirl ratio and intake air volume can be increased by 26.02% and 5.50%, respectively, comparing with the original machine. Under the present condition, the peak heat release rate and accumulated heat release increased by 4.92% and 8.29% respectively comparing with the original machine.
-
表 1 YN柴油机主要技术参数
Table 1. The main technical parameters of the YN diesel engine
参数 数值 型号 YN33CRD1 型式 4缸直列、4冲程 缸径×行程/mm 100×105 发动机排量/L 3.298 压缩比 17.5∶1 标定功率/kW 85 (3 200 r/min) 最大扭矩/Nm 300 (1 600~2 400 r/min) 气门重叠角/℃A 11 燃烧室型式 直喷ω型 气缸套型式 湿式 增压系统 废气涡轮增压器 燃油系统 BOSCH高压共轨系统 表 2 原机-边界直流段参数对比
Table 2. Comparison of original engine and boundary straight section parameters
名称 α β α/β L Lold/Lnew AB ABold/ABnew AC ACold/ACnew γ γold/γnew 原机 84° 82° 1.024 71 192.8 192.2 14° 边界 75° 75° 1 73 0.973 131 1.472 131 1.467 30° 0.467 表 3 正交试验因素水平表
Table 3. Levels of orthogonal experimental factors
水平 α/(°) β/(°) L/mm 1 86 85 73 2 84 82 71 3 82 79 69 表 4 试验方案及试验结果
Table 4. Experimental design and results
方案 α/(°) β/(°) L/mm 涡流比 进气量/g 1 86 85 73 3.02 1.47 2 86 82 71 3.44 1.57 3 86 79 69 3.66 1.60 4 84 79 73 3.19 1.49 5 84 85 71 3.72 1.55 6 84 82 69 4.07 1.59 7 82 82 73 3.27 1.52 8 82 79 71 3.83 1.56 9 82 85 69 4.15 1.59 表 5 试验结果分析
Table 5. Analysis of experimental results
指标 α/(°) β/(°) L/mm K1 10.12 10.89 9.48 K2 10.98 10.78 10.99 K3 11.25 10.68 11.88 涡流比 k1 3.37 3.63 3.16 k2 3.66 3.59 3.66 k3 3.75 3.56 3.96 极差RA 0.38 0.07 0.80 K1 4.64 4.61 4.48 K2 4.63 4.68 4.68 K3 4.67 4.65 4.78 进气量/g k1 1.55 1.54 1.49 k2 1.54 1.56 1.56 k3 1.56 1.55 1.59 极差RB 0.01 0.02 0.10 -
[1] WANG G X, YU W B, LI X B, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the influence of intake swirl on fuel spray and in-cylinder combustion characteristics on large bore diesel engine[J]. Fuel, 2019, 237: 209-221. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.156 [2] YOON S, LEE S, KWON H, et al. Effects of the swirl ratio and injector hole number on the combustion and emission characteristics of a light duty diesel engine[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 142: 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.06.076 [3] YOUSEFI A, GUO H S, BIROUK M. Effect of swirl ratio on NG/diesel dual-fuel combustion at low to high engine load conditions[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 229: 375-388. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.017 [4] CHEN Y L, LI X R, SHI S N, et al. Effects of intake swirl on the fuel/air mixing and combustion performance in a lateral swirl combustion system for direct injection diesel engines[J]. Fuel, 2021, 286: 119376. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119376 [5] CHARALAMBIDES A G, SAHU S, HARDALUPAS Y, et al. Evaluation of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) autoignition development through chemiluminescence imaging and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 210: 288-302. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.010 [6] TOKUDA S, KUBOTA M, NOGUCHI Y. Development of CFD shape optimization technology using the adjoint method and its application to engine intake port design[J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2013, 6(2): 833-842. doi: 10.4271/2013-01-0969 [7] WANG G X, YU W B, LI X B, et al. Influence of fuel injection and intake port on combustion characteristics of controllable intake swirl diesel engine[J]. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116548. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116548 [8] SHARMA V K, MOHAN M, MOULI C. Effect of intake swirl on the performance of single cylinder direct injection diesel engine[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 263(6): 062077. [9] AGARWAL A K, GADEKAR S, SINGH A P. In-cylinder air-flow characteristics of different intake port geometries using tomographic PIV[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29(9): 095104. doi: 10.1063/1.5000725 [10] BENAJES J, OLMEDA P, MARTÍN J, et al. Evaluation of swirl effect on the global energy balance of a HSDI diesel engine[J]. Energy, 2017, 122: 168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.082 [11] 张韦, 解礼兵, 陈朝辉, 等. 进气道螺旋段关键结构参数多目标优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(3): 337-344. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QCGC202103005.htmZHANG W, XIE L B, CHEN Z H, et al. Multi-objective optimization design of key structural parameters of spiral section of helical inlet[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 337-344. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QCGC202103005.htm [12] DAI X Y, WANG Z M, LIU F S, et al. The effect of nozzle structure and initial state on the primary breakup of diesel spray[J]. Fuel, 2020, 280: 118640. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118640 [13] ROSTAMIAN H, LOTFOLLAHI M N. Modified Redlich-Kwong and Peng-Robinson equations of state for solubility calculation of solid compounds in supercritical carbon dioxide[J]. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2016, 9(16): 1-11 doi: 10. 17485/ijst/2016/v9i16/52344. [14] 顾雨濛, 李铁, 魏义杰, 等. 柴油喷雾蒸发仿真中KH-RT模型的数值试验研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2019, 40(1): 36-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NRJG201901006.htmGU Y M, LI T, WEI Y J, et al. Numerical study on KH-RT model constants in simulation of evaporating diesel spray[J]. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering, 2019, 40(1): 36-41. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NRJG201901006.htm [15] 侯硕, 曹义华. 基于雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程的表面传热系数计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(6): 1319-1327. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201506007.htmHOU S, CAO Y H. Calculation of surface heat transfer coefficient based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(6): 1319-1327. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201506007.htm [16] AKHLAGHI H, ROOHI E, STEFANOV S. On the consequences of successively repeated collisions in no-time-counter collision scheme in DSMC[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2018, 161: 23-32. [17] 杜巍, 侯金赤, 安一峰. 壁面温度对柴油喷雾碰壁质量分布的影响[J]. 内燃机学报, 2019, 37(2): 130-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NRJX201902005.htmDU W, HOU J C, AN Y F. Effect of wall temperature on mass distribution of diesel spray-wall impingement[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2019, 37(2): 130-138. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NRJX201902005.htm [18] 张韦, 常少月, 陈朝辉, 等. DNH三燃料简化化学动力学机理的构建与验证[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2017, 23(4): 331-338. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RSKX201704008.htmZHANG W, CHANG S Y, CHEN Z H, et al. Construction and validation of a reduced chemical kinetics mechanism for diesel/natural gas/hydrogen engine simulations[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2017, 23(4): 331-338. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RSKX201704008.htm [19] JIANG S S, ZHU S W, WEN H, et al. Parameter analysis of diesel helical intake port numerical design[J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 16: 558-563. [20] ABO-ELFADL S, EL-SABOR MOHAMED A A. The effect of the helical inlet port design and the shrouded inlet valve condition on swirl generation in diesel engine[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2018, 140(3): 032203. [21] 程刚, 郭永存, 胡坤, 等. 永磁涡流调速器传动性能分析与正交实验优化[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2018, 37(12): 1948-1955. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20180085CHENG G, GUO Y C, HU K, et al. Transmission characteristics analysis and orthogonal experimental optimization of permanent magnet eddy current coupling[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 37(12): 1948-1955. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20180085