Automotive Energy Management Strategy with Load Following Threshold Change
-
摘要: 针对并联混合动力汽车的能量管理问题, 提出了一种新的启发式控制策略, 即负载跟随阈值改变策略(LTS)。LTS控制策略基于阈值变化机制和负载跟随方法, 可以与电池荷电状态(SOC)保持成比例的微小偏差, 能够有效确保电池持续稳定运行。与目前应用阈值变化机制的规则控制策略不同, 本文设计LTS控制策略的阈值通过电池荷电状态(SOC)和发动机转速来综合调整动力输出方式, 其能量管理的精细化程度更高。为了验证策略的有效性, 将该策略应用于混合动力汽车进行仿真测试, 并与传统的等效燃油消耗率最小化策略(ECMS)和电动辅助控制策略(EACS)进行性能对比。结果表明: 在燃油经济性方面, LTS控制策略优于EACS控制策略3.1%~10.4%, LTS控制策略优于ECMS控制策略2.5%~5.7%。在电池荷电状态(SOC)方面, LTS控制策略可以使得CSO值大于60%, 电池具有较好的运行状态。Abstract: Aiming at the energy management problem of parallel hybrid electric vehicle, a new heuristic control strategy, namely load following threshold change strategy (LTS), was proposed in this paper. Based on the threshold change mechanism and load following method, the LTS control strategy can maintain a small deviation proportional to the battery charge state (SOC), which can effectively ensure the battery to run continuously and stably. Different from the current regular control strategy which also applies the threshold change mechanism, the LTS control strategy designed in this paper comprehensively adjusts the power output mode through the battery state of charge (SOC) and the engine speed, and its energy management is more refined. In order to verify the effectiveness of the LTS strategy, the proposed strategy was applied to the hybrid electric vehicle for simulation test, and its performance was compared with the traditional equivalent fuel consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) and the electric assisted control strategy (EACS). The results show that the LTS control strategy is superior to the EACS control strategy by 3.1%-10.4% in fuel economy, and the LTS control strategy is superior to the ECMS control strategy by 2.5%-5.7%. In terms of battery state of charge (SOC), the LTS control strategy can make the CSO value greater than 60%, and the battery has a good running state.
-
Key words:
- hybrid electric vehicle /
- load following /
- threshold change /
- energy management /
- the control strategy
-
表 1 整车主要技术参数
参数 数值 满载质量/kg 1 500 空气阻力系数 0.34 滚动阻力系数 0.008 轮胎半径/m 0.286 迎风面积/m2 2.26 发动机最大功率/kW 63 发动机最大转矩/Nm 145 电机最大功率/kW 25 电机最大转矩/Nm 128 电池类型 铅酸电池 放电容量/Ah 25 主传动比 2.8 变速器传动比 0.75~3.63 表 2 计算得到的等效系数
工况 Sd, efc Sc, efc WL-L 4.40 3.77 WL-M 4.26 3.28 WL-H 3.70 3.12 WL-E 3.13 2.03 表 3 不同控制策略的等效燃油消耗及最终CSO值
工况 LTS ECMS EACS WL-L 0.0920(65.03%) 0.0949(64.40%) 0.1016(61.69%) WL-M 0.1574(65.04%) 0.1639(65.01%) 0.1733(58.06%) WL-H 0.2539(64.88%) 0.2684(59.03%) 0.2711(53.33%) WL-E 0.4077(64.81%) 0.4180(64.77%) 0.4203(55.86%) -
[1] SABRI M F M, DANAPALASINGAM K A, RAHMAT M F. A review on hybrid electric vehicles architecture and energy management strategies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 1433-1442. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.036 [2] SHABBIR W. Control strategies for series hybrid electric vehicles[D]. London: Imperial College London, 2016. [3] 张新亮, 周童. 基于双模式优化算法的并联混合动力汽车能量管理策略研究[J]. 车用发动机, 2020(6): 48-52+59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYFD202006008.htmZHANG X L, ZHOU T. Energy management strategy of parallel HEV based on dual-mode optimization algorithm[J]. Vehicle Engine, 2020(6): 48-52+59. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYFD202006008.htm [4] SHABBIR W, EVANGELOU S A. Exclusive operation strategy for the supervisory control of series hybrid electric vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2016, 24(6): 2190-2198. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2520904 [5] 金辉, 张子豪. 基于自适应动态规划的HEV能量管理研究综述[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(11): 1490-1496. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QCGC202011006.htmJIN H, ZHANG Z H. Review of research on HEV energy management based on adaptive dynamic programming[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(11): 1490-1496. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QCGC202011006.htm [6] KIM M, JUNG D, MIN K. Hybrid thermostat strategy for enhancing fuel economy of series hybrid intracity bus[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2014, 63(8): 3569-3579. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2013.2290700 [7] 胡建军, 杨颖, 邹玲菠, 等. 混合动力汽车自适应等效油耗最低能量管理策略[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2021, 44(12): 80-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FIVE202112007.htmHU J J, YANG Y, ZOU L B, et al. Adaptive equivalent consumption minimization strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2021, 44(12): 80-94. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FIVE202112007.htm [8] HOU C, OUYANG M G, XU L F, et al. Approximate Pontryagin's minimum principle applied to the energy management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 115: 174-189. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.002 [9] PANDAY A, BANSAL H O. Energy management strategy implementation for hybrid electric vehicles using genetic algorithm tuned Pontryagin's minimum principle controller[J]. International Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2016, 2016: 4234261. [10] 秦大同, 章晓星, 姚明尧. 计及能耗经济性和电池寿命的PHEV能量管理策略优化[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2020, 43(10): 1-11.QIN D T, ZHANG X X, YAO M Y. Optimization of PHEV energy management strategy considering battery life and energy consumption economy[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2020, 43(10): 1-11. (in Chinese) [11] DI CAIRANO S, LIANG W, KOLMANOVSKY I V, et al. Power smoothing energy management and its application to a series hybrid powertrain[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(6): 2091-2103. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2012.2218656 [12] 季桓收. PHEV电池配置和能量管理的协同优化[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2020, 45(16): 9-10.JI H S. Collaborative optimization of battery configuration and energy management in PHEV[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2020, 45(16): 9-10. (in Chinese) [13] LIU T, HU X S, LI S E, et al. Reinforcement learning optimized look-ahead energy management of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22(4): 1497-1507. [14] ZENG X R, WANG J M. A parallel hybrid electric vehicle energy management strategy using stochastic model predictive control with road grade preview[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2015, 23(6): 2416-2423. [15] 宋文福, 于忠贵, 张志斌, 等. 增程式混合动力汽车能量管理策略研究[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2020, 45(16): 80-81+95.SONG W F, YU Z G, ZHANG Z B, et al. Research on energy management of range-extended electric vehicles[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2020, 45(16): 80-81+95. (in Chinese) [16] LIN C C, PENG H, GRIZZLE J W, et al. Power management strategy for a parallel hybrid electric truck[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2003, 11(6): 839-849. [17] SERRAO L, ONORI S, RIZZONI G. ECMS as a realization of Pontryagin's minimum principle for HEV control[C]//2009 American Control Conference. St. Louis: IEEE, 2009: 3964-3969. [18] GENG B, MILLS J K, SUN D. Energy management control of microturbine-powered plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using the telemetry equivalent consumption minimization strategy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 60(9): 4238-4248. [19] 胡晓松, 陈科坪, 唐小林, 等. 基于机器学习速度预测的并联混合动力车辆能量管理研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(16): 181-192.HU X S, CHEN K P, TANG X L, et al. Machine learning velocity prediction-based energy management of parallel hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(16): 181-192. (in Chinese) [20] MUSARDO C, RIZZONI G, GUEZENNEC Y, et al. A-ECMS: an adaptive algorithm for hybrid electric vehicle energy management[J]. European Journal of Control, 2005, 11(4-5): 509-524. [21] 臧怀泉, 张琦, 强鹏辉, 等. 插电式混合动力汽车能量优化管理策略研究[J]. 燕山大学学报, 2020, 44(4): 388-396. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DBZX202004008.htmZANG H Q, ZHANG Q, QIANG P H, et al. Research on energy optimization management strategy of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Yanshan University, 2020, 44(4): 388-396. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DBZX202004008.htm [22] MONTAZERI-GH M, POURSAMAD A, GHALICHI B. Application of genetic algorithm for optimization of control strategy in parallel hybrid electric vehicles[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2006, 343(4-5): 420-435. [23] JOHNSON V H, WIPKE K B, RAUSEN D J. HEV control strategy for real-time optimization of fuel economy and emissions[J]. SAE Technical Paper, 2019, 45(21): 179-184. [24] 耿文冉, 楼狄明, 张彤. 基于粒子群优化的混合动力汽车多目标能量管理策略[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(7): 1030-1039. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ202007013.htmGENG W R, LOU D M, ZHANG T. Multi-objective energy management strategy for hybrid electric vehicle based on particle swarm optimization[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2020, 48(7): 1030-1039. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ202007013.htm [25] DELKHOSH M, SAADAT-FOUMANI M, ROSTAMI P. Optimization of power train and control strategy of hybrid electric vehicles[J]. Scientia Iranica B, 2015, 22(5): 1842-1854. [26] EVANGELOU S A, SHABBIR W. Dynamic modeling platform for series hybrid electric vehicles[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(11): 533-540. [27] LOT R, EVANGELOU S A. Green driving optimization of a series hybrid electric vehicle[C]//52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Firenze: IEEE, 2013: 2200-2207. [28] SCIARRETTA A, BACK M, GUZZELLA L. Optimal control of parallel hybrid electric vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2004, 12(3): 352-363.