留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Kriging模型并行加点策略的多目标优化方法

韩鼎 郑建荣 周骏彦

韩鼎, 郑建荣, 周骏彦. Kriging模型并行加点策略的多目标优化方法[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2016, 35(11): 1715-1720. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.1113
引用本文: 韩鼎, 郑建荣, 周骏彦. Kriging模型并行加点策略的多目标优化方法[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2016, 35(11): 1715-1720. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.1113
Han Ding, Zheng Jianrong, Zhou Junyan. A Multi-objective Optimization Method using Kriging Model and Parallel Point Adding Strategy[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 35(11): 1715-1720. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.1113
Citation: Han Ding, Zheng Jianrong, Zhou Junyan. A Multi-objective Optimization Method using Kriging Model and Parallel Point Adding Strategy[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 35(11): 1715-1720. doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.1113

Kriging模型并行加点策略的多目标优化方法

doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.2016.1113
基金项目: 

国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAF08B03)与上海市引进技术的吸收与创新年度计划项目(产-30-方向-28)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    韩鼎(1987-),博士研究生,研究方向为近似模型建模与多目标优化,jack0077555@163.com

    通讯作者:

    郑建荣(联系人),教授,博士导师,jrzheng@126.com

A Multi-objective Optimization Method using Kriging Model and Parallel Point Adding Strategy

  • 摘要: 针对复杂机械装备多学科多目标优化设计成本高、周期长等问题,提出一种近似模型与并行加点策略相结合的多目标优化方法。基于Kriging模型,将添加更新样本点定义为同时考虑Pareto最优解和预测误差的动态多目标优化问题,应用改进NSGA-II优化算法和极大极小距离准则,确定最优的并行更新样本点,在提高Kriging模型精度的同时实现多目标优化。测试函数验证和实例结果表明,该方法可有效提高复杂系统多目标优化效率,同时获得收敛性和分散性俱佳的Pareto最优解。
  • [1] Forrester A I J, Sobester A, Keane A J. Engineering design via surrogate modelling:a practical guide[M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons, 2008
    [2] Wang G G, Shan S. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006,129(4):370-380
    [3] 刘桂萍,韩旭,关凤娇.基于信赖域近似模型管理的多目标优化方法及其应用[J].中国机械工程,2008,19(10):1140-1143,1196 Liu G P, Han X, Guan F J. A multi-objective optimization method based on the trust region model management framework and its application[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2008,19(10):1140-1143,1196(in Chinese)
    [4] Parr J M, Keane A J, Forrester A I J, et al. Infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based optimization with constraint handling[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2012,44(10):1147-1166
    [5] Jones D R, Schonlau M, Welch W J. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1998,13(4):455-492
    [6] Knowles J. ParEGO:a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006,10(1):50-66
    [7] Zhang Q F, Liu W D, Tsang E, et al. Expensive multiobjective optimization by moea/d with gaussian process model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2009,14(3):456-474
    [8] Keane A J. Statistical improvement criteria for use in multiobjective design optimization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006,44(4):879-891
    [9] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:NSGA-Ⅱ[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002,6(2):182-197
    [10] Viana F A C, Venter G, Balabanov V. An algorithm for fast optimal latin hypercube design of experiments[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010,82(2):135-156
    [11] Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms[M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons, 2001
    [12] Mohan S C, Maiti D K. Structural optimization of rotating disk using response surface equation and genetic algorithm[J]. International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics, 2013,14(2):124-132
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  283
  • HTML全文浏览量:  45
  • PDF下载量:  15
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-12-25
  • 刊出日期:  2016-11-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回