产品规划中基于互补偏好的工程特性综合优先度估计研究

李思丰; 李延来; 蒲云; Kwai-Sang Chin

产品规划中基于互补偏好的工程特性综合优先度估计研究

1.
西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,成都 610031;
2.
西南交通大学轨道交通国家实验室,成都 610031;
3.
香港城市大学科学与工程学院制造工程与工程管理系,香港

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(70971017)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
李思丰(1982-)，博士研究生，研究方向为产品设计和质量工程，sf403@126.com;李延来(联系人)，副教授，博士生导师，lyl_2001@163.com

李思丰(1982-)，博士研究生，研究方向为产品设计和质量工程，sf403@126.com;李延来(联系人)，副教授，博士生导师，lyl_2001@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 152
- HTML全文浏览量: 25
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-06-27
- 刊出日期: 2015-06-10

Determination of the Integrated Priority Ratings of Engineering Characteristics Based on the Complementary Preference in Product Planning

1.
School of Traffic,Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031;
2.
National Lab of Orbit Traffic,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031;
3.
Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management,School of Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue,Kowloon Tong,Hong Kong

摘要

摘要: 工程特性综合优先度的确定是产品规划质量屋构建过程的一个关键步骤。为了以一种经济和有效的方式实现工程特性的改进目标,提出了基于互补偏好信息的工程特性综合优先度确定方法。在该方法中,首先根据本企业及其竞争对手产品的互补偏好信息和各项工程特性表现的竞争性评价,利用多属性决策方法分别建立了相应于质量功能配置团队中每一个成员的工程特性竞争性优先度确定的优化模型,并通过拉格朗日函数的构造求解这些模型,进而利用层次分析法确定基于偏好信息的工程特性技术点;其次,利用比例标度法和层次分析法的集成方法,确定实现工程特性表现的改进目标的优先度;最后,利用层次分析法,对基于顾客满意的工程特性优先度、基于偏好信息的工程特性技术点和实现工程特性表现的改进目标的优先度进行合成以确定工程特性的综合优先度。以某企业全自动洗碗机的产品改进设计为实例,说明方法的应用。
- 质量功能配置 /
- 质量屋 /
- 工程特性 /
- 优先度
Abstract: To determine the integrated priority ratings of engineering characteristics(ECs) is a crucial step in the process of building house of quality.In order to achieve the improvement goals of performances of ECs in an economic and effective way,a methodology for determining the integrated priority ratings of ECs based on complementary preference is proposed.In this methodology,according to the competitive evaluations of performances of ECs and complementary preference of the products of a company and its competitors,a model for determining the competitive importance ratings of ECs corresponding to every member of quality function deployment team is built by using multiple attribute decision making method,and this model is solved by using Lagrange function,and then the technical points of ECs based on preference evaluations are determined by analytical hierarchy process(AHP).Secondly,based on the integration of scale method and AHP,the priority rating of achieving the improvement target of performances(ITOP) of every EC is determined.Lastly,based on the combination of the customer-satisfaction-based priority rating,the preference-information-based technical point,and the priority rating of achieving the ITOP of every EC,the integrated priority ratings of ECs are determined by using AHP.A case study of product improvement development of a fully automatic dish machine in a corporation was provided to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology.
- quality function deployment /
- house of quality /
- engineering characteristics /
- priority rating

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	Camevalli J A,Miguel P C. Reviews,analysis,and classifica-tion of the literature on QFD-types of research,difficulties,and benefits[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2008,(02):737-754.
[2]	王美清,唐晓青. 一种面向产品规划过程的组合质量屋[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2004,(07):652-656.
[3]	车阿大,杨明顺. 质量功能配置理论及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2008.
[4]	Zheng L Y,Chin K S. QFD based optimal process quality plan-ning[J].International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2005,(08):831-841.
[5]	王美清,唐晓青. 产品设计中的用户需求与产品质量特征映射方法研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,(05):136-140.
[6]	车阿大,林志航,高国军. 改进的质量功能配置模型-模糊质量功能配置[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,(04).
[7]	杨明顺,林志航. QFD中顾客需求重要度确定的一种方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,(05):65-71.
[8]	周岫彬,杨海成. 基于特征的航天型号质量信息建模方法研究[J].机械科学与技术,2011,(04):532-537.
[9]	李朝玲,高齐圣. QFD中关联关系确定的正交试验设计方法[J].工业工程与管理,2009,(01):24-27.
[10]	陈清,刘志峰,张雷. 基于环境质量功能配置的绿色产品规划模型[J].机械科学与技术,2009,(01):36-40.
[11]	李朝玲,高齐圣. 质量功能展开中基于二元语义的顾客需求重要度的确定[J].计算机集成制造系统-CIMS,2009,(06).
[12]	Chan L K,Wu M L. Quality function deployment:a comprehen-sive review of its concepts and methods[J].Quality Engineer-ing,2002,(01):23-35.
[13]	Chan L K,Wu M L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example[J].Omega the International Journal of Management Science,2005,(01):119-139.
[14]	Chan T K,Raghavan V. Incorporating concepts of business prior-ity into quality funetlon deployment[J].International Journal of Innovation Management,2004,(01):21-35.
[15]	李延来,唐加福,姚建明. 质量屋构建的研究进展[J].机械工程学报,2009,(03):57-70.
[16]	朱龙英,朱如鹏,刘正埙. 公理化设计与质量功能配置集成研究[J].机械科学与技术,2004,(06):647-650.
[17]	高琦,吴昭同. 基于质量功能配置的产品优化设计[J].机械科学与技术,2002,(06):1031-1033.
[18]	徐泽水. 不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
[19]	任朝晖,宋乃慧,李小彭. 质量功能配置方法中模糊信息建模[J].机械工程学报,2007,(05):64-68.
[20]	王体春,卜良峰. 基于灰色关联分析的复杂产品方案设计多属性权重分配模型[J].机械科学与技术,2011,(07).
[21]	Sireli Y,Kauffmann P,Ozan E. Integration of Kano's model into QFD for multiple product design[J].IEEE Transaction on En-gineering Management,2007,(02):380-390.