Aerodynamic Performance Study on NPU-LL Blade Series Configuration
-
摘要: 为提高轴流压气机气动负荷和稳定性,本文将若干个叶片的前缘和后缘在不同轴向位置上沿圆周方向彼此交错排列,构成压气机的一个非均匀叶片排。提出了4种压气机叶片新型排布构型——NPU-刘-廖叶片系列构型,简称LL叶片系列构型, 分析了NPU-LL叶片系列构型的结构特征和参数,探索了其流动特性,初步揭示了NPU-LL叶片系列构型在流动控制方面的突出优势,计算了4种NPU-LL叶片叶栅布局的气动特性,并与常规叶栅进行了对比。研究结果表明,NPU-LL叶片系列构型打破了传统叶片均匀布局局限,可有效地提升压气机的气动性能,为压气机性能的优化设计提供了一种新思路。
-
关键词:
- NPU-LL叶片系列构型 /
- 压气机 /
- 气动性能 /
- 流动控制 /
- 特性计算
Abstract: In order to improve the aerodynamic load and stability of the axial compressor, the leading and trailing edges of several blades are arranged staggered with each other in the circumferential direction at different axial positions to form a non-uniform blade row of the compressor. This paper proposes four new configurations of compressor blades, which is uniformly defined as the NPU-Liu-Liao blade series configuration(Abbreviation: LL Blade). This paper introduces the structural characteristics and parameters of NPU-LL blade series configuration, explores its flow characteristics, and preliminarily reveals the prominent advantages of NPU-LL blade series configuration in flow control. The aerodynamic characteristics of four NPU-LL blade cascade layouts are calculated and compared with the conventional cascade. The results show that the configuration of NPU-LL blade series breaks the limitation of traditional blade uniform layout, which can effectively improve the aerodynamic performance of compressor and provide a new idea for the optimization design of compressor performance. -
表 1 123叶片构型特征参数
特征参数 定义 建议的取值范围 轴向宽度 L 周向间距 h1 h2 h3 前缘交错量 a1 4%~15% a2 4%~15% 后缘交错量 e1 4%~15% e2 4%~15% 1号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy1 2号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy2 1°~6°(Δβy2) 3号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy3 1°~6°(Δβy3) 表 2 122叶片构型特征参数
特征参数 定义 建议的取值范围 轴向宽度 L 周向间距 h1 h2 h3 前缘交错量 a1 4%~15% 后缘交错量 e1 4%~15% 1号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy1 2号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy21 1°~6°(Δβy21) 2号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy22 1°~6°(Δβy22) 表 3 132叶片构型特征参数
特征参数 定义 建议的取值范围 轴向宽度 L 周向间距 h1 h2 h3 前缘交错量 a1 4%~15% a2 4%~15% 后缘交错量 e1 4%~15% e2 4%~15% 1号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy1 2号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy2 1°~6°(Δβy2) 3号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy3 1°~6°(Δβy3) 表 4 12321叶片构型特征参数
特征参数 定义 建议的取值范围 轴向宽度 L 周向间距 h1 h2 h3 h4 前缘交错量 a1 4%~15% a2 4%~15% 后缘交错量 e1 4%~15% e2 4%~15% 1号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy1 2号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy21 1°~6°(Δβy21) 2号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy22 1°~6°(Δβy22) 3号叶片 叶型 安装角 βy3 1°~6°(Δβy3) 表 5 进口气流参数
进口总压/Pa 进口总温/K 进气攻角/(°) 进口马赫数 101 325 288.15 4 0.6 表 6 常规叶栅气动性能
攻角/(°) 损失系数 气流转折角/(°) 8 0.241 9 16.1 6 0.175 6 16.7 4 0.111 3 17.3 2 0.072 2 17.4 1 0.064 9 17.1 0 0.061 8 16.5 -1 0.061 2 15.8 -2 0.063 1 15.0 -4 0.080 0 12.4 -6 0.148 1 7.5 -8 0.291 7 2.4 表 7 NPU-LL叶片系列构型叶栅气动性能
叶栅布局 攻角/(°) 损失系数 气流转折角/(°) 123型叶栅 8 0.264 3 17.0 6 0.203 9 17.0 4 0.145 0 17.3 2 0.095 5 17.5 1 0.077 9 17.6 0 0.065 5 17.5 -1 0.059 6 17.2 -2 0.057 8 16.5 -4 0.060 6 15.0 -6 0.077 3 12.5 -8 0.138 5 8.0 122型叶栅 8 0.270 3 16.6 6 0.210 6 16.5 4 0.144 0 17.2 2 0.084 1 18.0 1 0.067 7 18.0 0 0.060 4 17.7 -1 0.058 0 17.1 -2 0.059 0 16.4 -4 0.063 1 14.5 -6 0.085 8 11.8 -8 0.150 2 7.3 132型叶栅 8 0.239 3 16.0 6 0.162 8 16.3 4 0.114 1 16.9 2 0.079 9 17.0 1 0.068 0 17.0 0 0.061 5 16.5 -1 0.060 7 15.9 -2 0.062 8 14.9 -4 0.077 5 12.2 -6 0.116 6 8.7 -8 0.209 7 4.4 12321型叶栅 8 0.242 4 15.0 6 0.183 9 16.5 4 0.117 4 16.7 2 0.075 3 16.8 1 0.066 2 16.5 0 0.062 5 16.0 -1 0.061 5 15.2 -2 0.062 1 14.5 -4 0.075 7 12.2 -6 0.124 2 8.5 -8 0.236 9 3.9 -
[1] GVMMER V, WENGER U, KAU H P. Using sweep and dihedral to control three-dimensional flow in transonic stators of axial compressor[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2000, 123(1): 40-48 [2] HAH C, PUTERBAUGH S L, WADIA A R. Control of shock structure and secondary flow field inside transonic compressor rotors through aerodynamic sweep[R]. ASME Paper 98-GT-561, 1998 [3] 单鹏, 桂幸民, 周盛, 等. 高负荷后掠风扇设计若干基本问题[J]. 工程热物理学报, 1999, 20(5): 576-579SHAN P, GUI X M, ZHOU S, et al. Fundamental considerations on high loading backward swept fan design[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 1999, 20(5): 576-579 (in Chinese) [4] 白杰, 熊碰, 史磊. 航空发动机风扇转叶弯掠优化及气动特性分析[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2020, 38(2): 7-12 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5590.2020.02.002BAI J, XIONG P, SHI L. Lean and sweep optimization for aero-engine fan blades and aerodynamic characteristics analyses[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2020, 38(2): 7-12 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5590.2020.02.002 [5] BAMMERT K, STAUDE R. Optimization for rotor blades of tandem design for axial flow compressors[J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1980, 102(2): 369-375 doi: 10.1115/1.3230263 [6] WU G, ZHANG B, GUO B. Experimental investigation of tandem blade cascade with double circular arc profile[R]. ASME Paper 85-IGT-94, 1985 [7] 魏巍, 刘波, 曹志远, 等. 高负荷小型压气机大弯角串列静子特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(5): 1066-1073 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201305013.htmWEI W, LIU B, CAO Z Y, et al. Characteristics of high-turning tandem stator in highly loaded small compressor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(5): 1066-1073 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201305013.htm [8] 张金欧文, 庄皓琬, 滕金芳. 轴流压气机串列静子叶片弯掠设计优化[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(32): 13482-13486 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.32.056ZHANG J O W, ZHUANG H W, TENG J F. Design optimization of axial compressor tandem stators using sweep and dihedral[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(32): 13482-13486 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.32.056 [9] WENNERSTROM A J, FROST G R. Design of a Rotor incorporating splitter vanes for a high pressure Ratio supersonic axial compressor stage[R]. Ohio: Patterson AFB, Aerospace Research Labs Wright, 1974 [10] 严明, 陈懋章. 大小叶片轴流压气机转子流动特性分析[J]. 推进技术, 2002, 23(4): 280-282 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2002.04.005YAN M, CHEN M Z. Flow performance analysis in an axial compressor rotor with splitter[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2002, 23(4): 280-282 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2002.04.005 [11] 张永新, 邹正平, 严明, 等. 单级大小叶片轴流压气机流动分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2004, 19(1): 89-93 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2004.01.017ZHANG Y X, ZOU Z P, YAN M, et al. Flow analysis of a single-stage axial flow compressor with splitter rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2004, 19(1): 89-93 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2004.01.017 [12] 李海鹏, 刘火星, 蒋浩康. 单级轴流大小叶片压气机非定常流场数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2006, 21(6): 1053-1057 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2006.06.018LI H P, LIU H X, JIANG H K. Unsteady flow analysis of a single-stage compressor with splitter vane using numerical method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2006, 21(6): 1053-1057 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2006.06.018 [13] MERCHANT A A. Design and analysis of axial aspirated compressor stages[D]. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1999 [14] REIJNEN D P. Experimental study of boundary layer suction in a transonic compressor[D]. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1997 [15] 兰发祥, 周拜豪, 梁德旺, 等. 跨、超声速吸附式压气机平面叶栅试验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2010, 25(5): 1123-1128 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201005026.htmLAN F X, ZHOU B H, LIANG D W, et al. Experimental investigation of transonic and supersonic aspirated compressor cascades[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(5): 1123-1128 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201005026.htm [16] 曹志远, 宋澄, 贾军锋, 等. 基于曲率诱导"伪激波"的高负荷吸附式压气机叶片设计[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(3): 200548 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJS202203018.htmCAO Z Y, SONG C, JIA J F, et al. Design of highly loaded aspirated compressor blade based on curvature induced 'Pseudo Shock'[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(3): 200548 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJS202203018.htm [17] 刘前智, 廖明夫, 王俨剀, 等. 一种提高叶片气动负荷的压气机叶栅布局: 中国, 200910021664.5[P]. 2010-09-29LIU Q Z, LIAO M F, WANG Y K, et al. A compressor cascade layout for increasing blade aerodynamic load: CN, 200910021664.5[P]. 2010-09-29 (in Chinese) [18] 刘前智, 廖明夫, 王四季, 等. 一种改善压气机气动稳定性的叶栅气动布局: 中国, 200910021665. X[P]. 2010-09-29LIU Q Z, LIAO M F, WANG S J, et al. A cascade aerodynamic layout for improving compressor aerodynamic stability: CN, 200910021665. X[P]. 2010-09-29 (in Chinese) [19] 廖明夫, 刘前智, 王俨剀, 等. 一种增加气动负荷及稳定性的压气机叶栅的叶片排布方式: 中国, 200910021663.0[P]. 2010-09-29LIAO M F, LIU Q Z, WANG Y K, et al. A blade arrangement method for compressor cascade with increasing aerodynamic load and stability: CN, 200910021663.0[P]. 2010-09-29 (in Chinese) [20] 刘前智, 廖明夫, 王俨剀, 等. 一种提高轴流压气机气动性能的转动叶片排布局: 中国, 200910023442.7[P]. 2010-12-01LIU Q Z, LIAO M F, WANG Y K, et al. A rotating blade layout for improving aerodynamic performance of axial compressor: CN, 200910023442.7[P]. 2010-12-01 (in Chinese) [21] 王建军, 于长波, 李其汉. 错频叶盘结构振动模态局部化特性分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2009, 24(4): 788-792 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI200904013.htmWANG J J, YU C B, LI Q H. Localization characteristics of vibratory mode for bladed disk assemblies[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(4): 788-792 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI200904013.htm [22] 韩乐, 王延荣. 转子叶片气弹稳定性与强迫响应分析[J]. 航空发动机, 2021, 47(4): 82-90 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKFJ202104010.htmHAN L, WANG Y R. Analysis of aeroelastic stability and forced response of rotor blades[J]. Aeroengine, 2021, 47(4): 82-90 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKFJ202104010.htm [23] 宋兆泓. 叶片颤振抑制技术的研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 1988(4): 327-332 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI198804009.htmSONG Z H. Research on control technique of blade flutter[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 1988(4): 327-332 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI198804009.htm [24] 张翔, 陈玉春, 黄秀全. 高低空环境下压气机叶片颤振特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(4): 572-578ZHANG X, CHEN Y C, HUANG X Q. Research on flutter characteristics of compressor blades in high and low altitude[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(4): 572-578 (in Chinese)