Design and Stability Analysis of Three-cylinder Rngine Mounting System using Evidence Theory
-
摘要: 针对基于不确定性参数条件下三缸发动机悬置系统不满足稳健性设计要求问题,提出了一种基于证据理论的悬置系统优化及稳定性分析方法。在考虑了悬置系统参数不确定性的条件下,首先基于证据理论原理并结合遗传算法,对悬置系统参数进行优化设计。然后分析优化后的参数在不确定性条件下悬置系统满足稳定性设计要求的概率累计分布曲线。最后,在不确定参数区间存在波动时验证优化参数的最优性。Abstract: Aiming at the problem that the mounting system of three cylinder engine can not meet the requirements of robust design considering some uncertain parameters, a method of mounting system optimization and stability analysis based on evidence theory is proposed in this paper. Considering the uncertainty of the parameters of the suspension system, based on the evidence theory and genetic algorithm, the parameters of the engine suspension system are optimized. Then, the probability cumulative distribution curve of the optimized parameters under the uncertainty condition is analyzed, and the result shows that the suspension system meets the stability design requirements. Finally, the optimized parameters are verified when there is fluctuation in the uncertain parameter range.
-
Key words:
- mount system /
- uncertain parameters /
- evidence theory /
- optimal design /
- stability analysis
-
表 1 各悬置静刚度的初始值
悬置 Ku /(N·mm−1) Kv /(N·mm−1) Kw /(N·mm−1) 左悬置 45 60 280 右悬置 45 60 280 后悬置 63 195 195 表 2 动力总成固有频率和能量分布计算结果
名称 X Y Z Rx Ry Rz 要求值 4.0-8.0 4.0-8.0 8.0-12.0 14.0-17.0 16.0-18.0 18.0-20.0 固有频率/Hz 5.8 4.2 12.1 16.4 18.3 20.6 要求值 $\geqslant 75.0$ $\geqslant 75.0 $ $\geqslant 90.0 $ $\geqslant 80.0 $ $\geqslant 60.0 $ $\geqslant 60.0 $ 能量分布/% 99.2 77.1 90.4 84.0 67.8 71.4 表 3 悬置刚度的不确定性取值
悬置 取值范围/(N·mm−1) 左悬置 [252,308] 右悬置 [252,308] 后悬置 [175.5,214.5] 表 4 悬置刚度基本可信度分配
悬置 焦元区间/(N·mm−1) m 左悬置 [252,266] 0.2 [266,280] 0.3 [280,294] 0.3 [294,308] 0.2 右悬置 [252,266] 0.2 [266,280] 0.3 [280,294] 0.3 [294,308] 0.2 后悬置 [175.5,188.5] 0.3 [188.5,201.5] 0.4 [201.5,214.5] 0.3 表 5 悬置刚度优化值
悬置 Ku /(N·mm−1) Kv /(N·mm−1) Kw /(N·mm−1) 左悬置 56 54 224 右悬置 56 54 224 后悬置 55 148 156 表 6 优化后动力总成固有频率和能量分布
名称 X Y Z Rx Ry Rz 固有频率/Hz 6.0 4.0 10.9 14.7 16.4 18.3 能量分布/% 98.5 76.8 90.9 81.4 60.5 64.0 表 7 悬置刚度的不确定性取值
悬置 变动范围 /(N·mm−1) 左悬置 [201.6,246.4] 右悬置 [201.6,246.4] 后悬置 [140.4,171.6] 表 8 各悬置w向刚度基本可信度分配
悬置 焦元区间/(N·mm−1) m 左悬置 [201.6,212.8] 0.2 [212.8,224] 0.3 [224,235.2] 0.3 [235.2,246.4] 0.2 右悬置 [201.6,212.8] 0.2 [212.8,224] 0.3 [224,235.2] 0.3 [235.2,246.4] 0.2 后悬置 [201.6,212.8] 0.3 [212.8,224] 0.4 [224,235.2] 0.3 -
[1] 刘晓昂, 上官文斌, 吕兆平. 三缸发动机悬置系统设计方法的研究[J]. 振动工程学报, 2016, 29(5): 804-813LIU X A, SHANGGUAN W B, LYU Z P. Design methods of the powertrain mounting system with three cylinders engine[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2016, 29(5): 804-813 (in Chinese) [2] 谢展, 于德介, 李蓉. 汽车发动机悬置系统的多目标稳健优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2013, 35(10): 893-897 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-680X.2013.10.008XIE Z, YU D J, LI R. Multi-objective robust optimization design of vehicle engine mount systems[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2013, 35(10): 893-897 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-680X.2013.10.008 [3] GOBBI M, LEVI F, MASTINU G. Multi-objective stochastic optimisation of the suspension system of road vehicles[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 298(4-5): 1055-1072 doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.06.041 [4] 谢展, 于德介, 李蓉, 等. 基于区间分析的发动机悬置系统稳健优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2014, 36(12): 1503-1507, 1527XIE Z, YU D J, LI R, et al. Robust optimization design of engine mount systems based on interval analysis[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2014, 36(12): 1503-1507, 1527 (in Chinese) [5] CAI B H, SHANGGUAN W B, LYU H. An efficient analysis and optimization method for powertrain mounting systems involving interval uncertainty[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2020, 234(5): 1318-1329 doi: 10.1177/0954407019880370 [6] 靳国才, 刘夫云, 邓聚才. 汽车动力总成悬置系统的优化研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2014, 33(2): 271-275JIN G C, LIU F Y, DENG J C. Optimization for automobile powertrain mounting system[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 33(2): 271-275 (in Chinese) [7] ZHOU H, LIU H, GAO P, et al. Optimization design and performance analysis of vehicle powertrain mounting system[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 31(1): 31 doi: 10.1186/s10033-018-0237-2 [8] YIN S W, YU D J, YIN H, et al. A new evidence-theory-based method for response analysis of acoustic system with epistemic uncertainty by using Jacobi expansion[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 322: 419-440 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.04.020 [9] 姜潮, 张哲, 韩旭, 等. 一种基于证据理论的结构可靠性分析方法[J]. 力学学报, 2013, 45(1): 103-115 doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-12-040JIANG C, ZHANG Z, HAN X. An evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method for uncertain structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2013, 45(1): 103-115 (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-12-040 [10] 苏瑜, 唐和生, 薛松涛, 等. 基于证据理论的结构非概率可靠性拓扑优化设计[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2019, 49(3): 320-330 doi: 10.1360/N092018-00115SU Y, TANG H S, XUE S T, et al. Approach of non-probabilistic reliability topology optimization using evidence theory[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2019, 49(3): 320-330 (in Chinese) doi: 10.1360/N092018-00115