Acoustic Emission Characteristic Analysis of Tensile Damage Process for DP780 Weld Bonding Specimens
-
摘要: 针对1.2 mm厚的DP780高强钢板, 进行胶接点焊响应面实验。采集胶焊接头拉伸过程的声发射信号, 拟合拉伸过程撞击计数的历程图, 对信号进行小波包分解并分析归一化能量特征, 对比分析胶焊接头界面撕裂与基板撕裂失效形式声发射信号时域及频域特征, 并建立胶层失效时的累计撞击计数与焊接工艺参数之间的回归模型。结果表明: 界面撕裂与基板撕裂失效形式在屈服和断裂阶段产生声发射信号, 且两种失效形式对应阶段频率分布相似, 屈服阶段与断裂瞬间频率分别分布于31.25~281.25 kHz和31.25~125 kHz, 但界面撕裂失效在胶层断裂瞬间比基板撕裂失效产生更多组声发射信号; 胶层失效时累计撞击计数与焊接电流存在负相关性。Abstract: The response surface experiment of weld bonding was carried out for 1.2 mm thick DP780 high-strength steel sheet. The Acoustic Emission(AE) signals of weld bonding joints were collected in the tensile process. The diagram of impact counting in the tensile process were fitted. The signals were decomposed by using the wavelet packet, and the normalized energy characteristics were analyzed. The time-domain and frequency-domain characteristics of AE signals of interfacial fracture and sheet fracture were analyzed. The regression model between the cumulative impact counting and welding parameters was established. The results show that the failure modes of interfacial fracture and sheet fracture produce AE signals at yield and fracture stages. The frequency distributions of the two failure modes are similar. The frequencies distribution of yield stage and fracture moment are 31.25-281.15 kHz and 31.25-125 kHz, respectively. However, the interfacial fracture produces more AE signals than the sheet fracture at the moment of adhesive layer fracture; there is a negative correlation between the cumulative impact counting and the welding current when the adhesive layer fails.
-
Key words:
- weld bonding /
- AE signals /
- tensile test /
- wavelet packet /
- response surface
-
表 1 因素范围及水平表
编号 因素名称 水平编码 -1 0 1 x1 焊接电流/kA 7 8 9 x2 焊接时间/ms 100 125 150 x3 电极压力/MPa 0.3 0.35 0.4 表 2 方差分析表
模型 项目及因素 平方和SS 自由度f 均方误差MS 检验值F值 P值Prob > F 显著性 累计撞击
计数模型 491 600 000 6 81 930 000 12.35 0.001 2 显著 x1 277 800 000 1 277 800 000 41.87 0.000 2 x2 25 580 000 1 25 580 000 3.85 0.085 2 x3 54 880 000 1 54 880 000 8.27 0.020 6 x1x3 27 950 000 1 27 950 000 4.21 0.0742 x22 74 960 000 1 74 960 000 11.30 0.009 9 x32 37 470 000 1 37 470 000 5.65 0.044 8 失拟项 44 620 000 8 7 437 000 1.76 0.405 9 不显著 -
[1] PETRIE E M. Weldbonding-A hybrid method of assembly[J]. Metal Finishing, 2013, 111(2): 42-44 doi: 10.1016/S0026-0576(13)70163-6 [2] XIAO Z J, ZENG K, HE X C, et al. Fatigue strength and failure analysis of weld-bonded joint of stainless steel[J]. The Journal of Adhesion, 2019, 95(3): 187-203 doi: 10.1080/00218464.2017.1414605 [3] 张龙, 曾凯, 何晓聪, 等. 钛合金胶接点焊与电阻点焊接头性能对比分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(1): 55-60 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXB201801013.htmZHANG L, ZENG K, HE X C, et al. Comparison of joint performance between spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding of titanium alloy[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2018, 39(1): 55-60 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXB201801013.htm [4] DROUBI M G, FAISAL N H, ORR F, et al. Acoustic emission method for defect detection and identification in carbon steel welded joints[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 134: 28-37 doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.03.012 [5] HE K F, XIA Z X, SI Y, et al. Noise reduction of welding crack AE signal based on EMD and wavelet packet[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(3): 761 doi: 10.3390/s20030761 [6] LUO Y, LI J L, WU W. Characterization of nugget nucleation quality based on the structure-borne acoustic emission signals detected during resistance spot welding process[J]. Measurement, 2013, 46(3): 1053-1060 doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.016 [7] 罗怡. 基于结构负载声发射检测的低碳钢板电阻点焊飞溅表征[J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(14): 150-154 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201414025.htmLUO Y. Expulsion characterization for resistance spot welding of low carbon steel based on structure-borne acoustic emission signals detection[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(14): 156-160 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201414025.htm [8] LUO Y, WAN R, XIE X J, et al. Expulsion analysis of resistance spot welding on zinc-coated steel by detection of structure-borne acoustic emission signals[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84(9-12): 1995-2002 doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7846-z [9] 罗怡, 谢小健, 朱洋, 等. 铝合金脉冲MIG焊接熔滴过渡行为的声发射信号时频域表征[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(4): 83-86, 91 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXB201504020.htmLUO Y, XIE X J, ZHU Y, et al. Time and frequency domain analysis of metal droplet transfer by acoustic emission signals during pulse MIG welding of aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2015, 36(4): 83-86, 91 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXB201504020.htm [10] 张一辉, 张文斌, 许飞云, 等. Q235B钢板拉伸损伤试验的声发射特性[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(15): 156-161 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201515029.htmZHANG Y H, ZHANG W B, XU F Y, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of Q235B steel plates on tensile damage testing[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(15): 156-161 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201515029.htm [11] 雷经发, 邬竞雄, 刘涛, 等. Q235钢拉伸过程声发射能量谱与奇异性指数特征提取[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2019, 38(12): 1954-1959 doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20190280LEI J F, WU J X, LIU T, et al. Feature extraction of acoustic emission energy spectrum and singularity index in tensile process of Q235 steel[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2019, 38(12): 1954-1959 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8728.20190280 [12] HERBELOT C, HOANG T D, IMAD A, et al. Damage mechanisms under tension shear loading in friction stir spot welding[J]. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2010, 15(8): 688-693 [13] 高双胜, 易冠英, 赵宸, 等. S线缺陷对搅拌摩擦焊接头断裂机制的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2016, 45(7): 198-199, 206 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJGY201607057.htmGAO S S, YI G Y, ZHAO C, et al. Influence of S curve defect on fracture mechanism of friction stir welding joints[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2016, 45(7): 198-199, 206 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJGY201607057.htm [14] AMER A O, GLOANEC A L, COURTIN S, et al. Characterization of fatigue damage in 304L steel by an acoustic emission method[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 66: 651-660 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.117