Study on Dynamic Response Characteristics of JQ900A Bridge Erecting Machine under Wind Load
-
摘要: 鉴于架桥机发生前倾或侧翻事故较多,对其在风载作用下的结构动态响应进行了研究。首先构建了具有指数风廓线和Kaimal脉动风功率谱特性的风场模型,并采用FFT技术得到自然风风载时程曲线;其次,针对风载情况下JQ900A型架桥机架桥的4种危险工况,建立了架桥机的有限元模型,通过静力学分析进一步确定危险工况下整机的危险部位;最终将风载作为输入条件,对架桥机进行瞬态动力学分析,研究其危险部位的位移及应力特性。结果表明: 轴线方向风载对架桥机结构动态响应影响最大,并且架桥机其他方向上稳定性和自身阻尼作用更强,因此更容易发生前倾事故。当处于半载和落梁工况时,主梁和前支腿的动态响应尤为明显,是实时监测和结构改进的重点。Abstract: Considering that there are many forward tilt or rollover accidents of bridge erecting machines, the dynamic response characteristics of the structure under wind load is studied in this paper. Firstly, a wind field model with exponential wind speed profile and Kaimal spectrum of stochastic fluctuating wind is constructed, and the pressure-time curve of natural wind is obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) method. Secondly, according to the four representative dangerous working conditions under wind load of the JQ900A bridge erecting machine, a finite element model of the bridge erecting machine is established, and the dangerous parts of the whole machine under dangerous working conditions are further determined through static analysis. Eventually the transient dynamic analysis of the bridge erecting machine is carried out with the wind load as the input condition, the displacement and stress characteristics of dangerous parts are studied. Studies prove that the axis wind load produces major effects, because the stability and self-damping are stronger in other directions, so it is more prone to forward tilt accidents. The dynamic response of the main beam and the front leg is especially obvious when the beam is half-loaded and falling, which will be the focus of real-time monitoring and structural improvement.
-
Key words:
- fluctuating wind /
- transient analysis /
- forward tilt /
- bridge erecting machine
-
表 1 不同高度静力风风速
风力等级 名称 10 m高静力风风速/(m·s-1) 20 m高静力风风速/(m·s-1) 6 强风 13.8 15.2 11 暴风 32.6 35.9 表 2 架桥机各支腿的自由度约束情况
约束点 A B C D E F G H 约束自由度 XYZ XYZ Y Y YZ YZ XYZ XYZ 表 3 4种工况下的静载施加情况
工况 小车状态 加载面编号 压力/Pa 1 空载 1 119 288 2 119 288 2 半载 1 119 288 3 945 131 3 刚完成取梁 1 945 131 4 945 131 4 准备落梁 2 945 131 5 945 131 表 4 静力仿真计算结果
工况 整机最大变形/mm 整机最大应力/MPa 前支腿最大变形/mm 前支腿最大应力/MPa 1 5.778(主梁最左端) 140(前支腿) 0.983 69.9 2 9.555(主梁前段正中) 142(中支腿) 1.886 95.9 3 8.255(主梁前段中间) 155(中支腿) 1.643 111 4 7.055(主梁前段中间) 140(中支腿) 1.568 130 -
[1] 兰瑞鹏. 高速铁路架桥机结构稳定性分析[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2010LAN R P. The structural stability analysis of high-speed railway erector[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2010 (in Chinese) [2] 李丙寅. SLJ900流动式架桥机仿真分析研究[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2014LI B Y. Research on simulation and analysis of SLJ900 mobile type bridge erecting machine[D]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2014 (in Chinese) [3] 程晔, 谢瑾荣, 张乐亲, 等. TPZ/48钢箱梁式架桥机施工状态下屈曲稳定性研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(1): 35-40 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201201006.htmCHENG Y, XIE J R, ZHANG L Q, et al. Study on the buckling stability of TPZ/48 steel box girder type bridge erection machine under construction state[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(1): 35-40 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201201006.htm [4] 刘金. 运架一体式架桥机的结构分析[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2012LIU J. The structural analysis of transport-erection integrated erector[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2012 (in Chinese) [5] 李永乐, 杨怿, 陈杰, 等. 龙门式双主梁架桥机施工抗风性能研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2011(4): 10-14, 29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLJS201104004.htmLI Y L, YANG Y, CHEN J, et al. Study of wind-resistant performance of double-main-beam overhead launching gantry in construction process[J]. Bridge Construction, 2011(4): 10-14, 29 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLJS201104004.htm [6] 刘树堂. 架桥机跨武广高速铁路时的抗风稳定性研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(4): 854-861 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2018.04.005LIU S T. Research on wind-resistance stability of the bridge-erecting machine acrossing the Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed rail[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(4): 854-861 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2018.04.005 [7] 马建, 孙守增, 芮海田, 等. 中国筑路机械学术研究综述·2018[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(6): 1-164 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.06.001MA J, SUN S Z, RUI H T, et al. Review on China′s road construction machinery research progress: 2018[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(6): 1-164 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.06.001 [8] 罗涛. 边界层夹卷参数化及光学湍流特性的室内模拟研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2008LUO T. Laboratory tank study on the entrainment parameterization and the optical turbulence characteristics of the atmospheric boundary layer[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2008 (in Chinese) [9] 张相庭. 工程结构风荷载理论和抗风计算手册[M]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 1990ZHANG X T. Handbook for wind load theory and wind resistance calculation of engineering structures[M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 1990 (in Chinese) [10] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 26470-2011架桥机通用技术条件[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People′s Republic of China. GB/T 26470-2011 General specification for launching machine[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2012 (in Chinese) [11] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 28591-2012风力等级[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社中准会2012General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People′s Republic of China. GB/T 28591-2012 Wind scale[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2012 (in Chinese) [12] CAO Y H, XIANG H F, ZHOU Y. Simulation of stochastic wind velocity field on long-span bridges[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126(1): 1-6 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(1) [13] 汪斌, 李永乐, 郝超, 等. 大跨度连续刚构桥钝化主梁气动特性数值分析[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2008, 34(5): 29-33 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ACZJ200805007.htmWANG B, LI Y L, HE C, et al. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic characteristics of the blunt deck of long span continuous rigid frame bridges[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2008, 34(5): 29-33 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ACZJ200805007.htm [14] 刘徽. 起重机风载荷的数字仿真研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2007LIU H. A research on numerical simulation of the crane wind load[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007 (in Chinese) [15] OLMOS J M, ASTIZ M Á. Improvement of the lateral dynamic response of a high pier viaduct under turbulent wind during the high-speed train travel[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 165: 368-385 doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.054 [16] Comité Européen de Normalisation. EN-1991-1-4 Eurocode 1: actions on structures-Part 1-4: general actions-wind actions[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2005 [17] 乔帅斌. 复杂形体大跨空间结构风压与等效静风荷载数值模拟[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2014QIAO S B. Numerical simulation on wind pressure and equivalent static wind loads of long span structures with complex shape[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014 (in Chinese) [18] 熊国辉. JQ850型双向步履架桥机工程应用研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019, 36(3): 91-95 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201903016.htmXIONG G H. Engineering application research of JQ850 bi-directional walking bridge erecting machine[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2019, 36(3): 91-95 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201903016.htm