Analysis of Initial Fatigue Quality for Representative Structure Detail of TC4
-
摘要: 针对飞机结构中常用的钛合金典型结构细节,采用原始疲劳质量方法对其耐久性进行了分析。首先完成了钛合金典型结构细节在3个应力水平下的耐久性试验,通过疲劳断口判读补充了小裂纹扩展数据集,统计获得了各应力水平下的裂纹形成时间TTCI及通用当量初始缺陷尺寸EIFS的概率分布及特征参数。在此基础上,预测了典型结构细节95%可靠度疲劳寿命,并基于EIFS分布预测了95%可靠度的当量初始裂纹尺寸,结果表明该钛合金典型结构细节满足设计要求。Abstract: For the representative structure detail of titanium alloy applied in aeronautical engineering structure, the durability is analyzed by using the initial fatigue quality method. The durability tests of the representative structure detail of titanium alloy under 3 stress levels are performed on Instron8802 test machine. The crack growth data of the representative structure detail is obtained by analyzing the fracture via electron microscope. The probabilistic characteristics for the time of crack initiation (TTCI) and equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) are achieved with the statistical analysis of test data. Then, the 95% reliability fatigue life is predicted via initial fatigue quality method. Besides, the 95% reliability EIFS is also calculated based on EIFS distribution. Results show that the representative structure detail of titanium alloy meets the requirement of durability design.
-
表 1 3组试验应力水平
高应力/MPa 中应力/MPa 低应力/MPa 485.419 463.355 441.290 表 2 给定参考裂纹尺寸ar下计算出的TTCI数据表(中应力)
断口编号 TTCI(k)/fh ar=0.35 mm ar=0.65 mm ar=0.95 mm ar=1.25 mm ar=1.55 mm ar=1.85 mm ar=2.15 mm 1(31020) 19 746.22 20 013.35 20 501.79 20 762.54 21 004.15 21 138.19 21 413.49 2(31021) 12 673.61 13 575.11 13 972.85 14 455.69 14 952.70 15 309.42 15 632.05 3(31022) 11 534.79 12 362.99 12 766.88 13 631.23 14 364.82 14 931.95 15 473.45 4(31023) 20 369.55 21 463.12 22 052.39 22 560.80 23 383.33 23 550.87 23 775.01 5(31024) 12 560.46 14 125.69 14 685.94 14 862.04 15 446.96 15 810.33 15 991.27 TTCI均值 15 376.93 16 308.05 16 795.97 17 254.46 17 830.39 18 148.15 18 457.05 表 3 3组应力水平下TTCI分布参数
σ/MPa Q α β ε 485.419 5.347×10-4 4.205 13 279.402 1 251.896 463.355 5.828×10-4 3.247 18 093.428 1 148.678 441.290 3.093×10-4 3.213 20 842.969 2 164.387 表 4 优化后通用EIFS分布参数
ar xu α Qβ 0.89 0.78 4.259 5 6.906 5 表 5 预测寿命结果
ar/mm σ/MPa TR/fh TMIN/fh TAVE/fh 485.419 5 398.91 10 150.68 12 084.42 0.65 463.355 7 071.76 12 362.99 16 308.05 441.290 9 385.87 12 929.07 18 649.93 485.419 6 483.02 10 718.89 13 355.05 1.25 463.355 8 491.78 13 631.23 17 254.46 441.290 11 270.57 14 049.53 20 735.20 485.419 7 132.97 10 937.23 14 095.52 1.85 463.355 9 343.11 14 931.95 18 148.15 441.290 12 400.49 15 205.25 22 135.03 -
[1] 王远达, 梁永胜, 王宏伟. 飞机结构的耐久性与损伤容限设计[J]. 飞机设计, 2009, 29(1): 37-43 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4599.2009.01.008WANG Y D, LIANG Y S, WANG H W. Design of durability and damage tolerance for aircraft structure[J]. Aircraft Design, 2009, 29(1): 37-43 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4599.2009.01.008 [2] 王旭亮, 聂宏, 薛彩军. 飞机起落架结构疲劳与寿命设计展望[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2009, 28(7): 921-925 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-8728.2009.07.018WANG X L, NIE H, XUE C J. A review of fatigue life design for a landing gear[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2009, 28(7): 921-925 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-8728.2009.07.018 [3] CORREIA J A F O, BLASÓN S, DE JESUS A M P, et al. Fatigue life prediction based on an equivalent initial flaw size approach and a new normalized fatigue crack growth model[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 69: 15-28 doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.003 [4] MA L Q, ZHANG Z C, GAO L Y, et al. An experimental study on the durability of icephobic slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS) pertinent to aircraft anti-/de-icing[C]//2018 Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Atlanta, Georgia: AIAA, 2018: 3654 [5] 郝红武. 缝翼操纵齿轮齿条虚拟弯曲疲劳耐久性分析[J]. 航空工程进展, 2018, 9(2): 274-280 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKGC201802020.htmHAO H W. Analysis for virtual bending fatigue durability of slat gear-rack mechanism[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2018, 9(2): 274-280 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKGC201802020.htm [6] 陈勃, 吴学仁, 刘建中. 基于小裂纹扩展的耐久性分析和经济寿命预测方法[J]. 机械强度, 2004, 26(S1): 246-249 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXQD2004S1071.htmCHEN B, WU X R, LIU J Z. Durability analysis and economic life prediction using small crack theory[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2004, 26(S1): 246-249 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXQD2004S1071.htm [7] 杨谋存, 聂宏. 原始疲劳质量评定和裂纹扩展方法研究[J]. 航空材料学报, 2011, 31(5): 91-94 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5053.2011.5.018YANG M C, NIE H. New assessment method of initial fatigue quality and crack growth rate[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2011, 31(5): 91-94 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5053.2011.5.018 [8] 曹昌年, 王志智, 赵选民. 紧固孔原始疲劳质量评定及符合性检查[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2000, 18(1): 15-18 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2000.01.004CAO C N, WANG Z Z, ZHAO X M. Evaluation and coincidence check for initial fatigue quality of fastener hole[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2000, 18(1): 15-1(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2000.01.004 [9] 李华, 贺飞, 马英杰, 等. TC4钛合金两种显微组织的紧固孔原始疲劳质量研究[J]. 航空材料学报, 2013, 33(2): 81-86 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKCB201302015.htmLI H, HE F, MA Y J, et al. Initial fatigue quality of faster holes of TC4 titanium alloy with two microstructures[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2013, 33(2): 81-86 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKCB201302015.htm [10] 周俊杰, 王生楠. 飞机机翼壁板紧固孔细节原始疲劳质量评估[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2018, 36(1): 91-95 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBGD201801013.htmZHOU J J, WANG S N. Initial fatigue quality assessment for aircraft wing panel fastener hole[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, ;6(1): 91-95 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBGD201801013.htm [11] 董登科, 王俊扬, 孔繁杰. 紧固孔原始疲劳质量控制与制孔技术研究[J]. 机械强度, 2000, 22(3): 214-216, 230 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXQD200003015.htmDONG D K, WANG J Y, KONG F J. Research on fastener hole initial fatigue quality and manufacter technique[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2000, 22(3): 214-216, 230 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXQD200003015.htm [12] 王晓森, 高行山, 孙贤, 等. 冷挤压对钛合金紧固结构件的耐久性影响研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2012, 31(10): 1601-1604 https://journals.nwpu.edu.cn/jxkxyjs/article/id/5529WANG X S, GAO H S, SUN X, et al. Effect of cold expansion on durability of fastener hole structure parts of titanium alloy[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 31(10): 1601-1604 (in Chinese) https://journals.nwpu.edu.cn/jxkxyjs/article/id/5529 [13] 王晓森, 刘庆华, 王宇魁, 等. Ti-6Al-4V钛合金紧固孔件原始疲劳质量评定和符合性检查[J]. 热加工工艺, 2010, 39(24): 21-23, 37 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJGY201024007.htmWANG X S, LIU Q H, WANG Y K, et al. Evaluation and coincidence check for initial fatigue quality of fastener hole of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2010, 39(24): 21-23, 37 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJGY201024007.htm [14] ANTUNES R A, SALVADOR C A F, DE OLIVEIRA M C L. Materials selection of optimized titanium alloys for aircraft applications[J]. Materials Research, 2018, 21(2): e20170979 [15] 中国航空研究院. 军用飞机疲劳损伤容限耐久性设计分手册(第四册): 耐久性设计[M]. 北京: 中国航空研究院, 1994: 32-71Chinese Aeronautical Establishment. Military aircraft fatigue, damage tolerance and durability design manual (Vol 4): durability design[M]. Beijing: Chinese Aeronautical Establishment, 1994: 32-71 (in Chinese)