Optimization of Multi-area Layup Structure for Composite Control Arm
-
摘要: 使用碳纤维复合材料设计某乘用车悬架控制臂,对4个区域的铺层结构进行优化设计。首先以各角度铺层厚度为设计变量对控制臂模态频率、质量和各工况应变能进行优化;然后以前三阶模态频率为目标,弯曲刚度参数作为设计变量优化铺层顺序。针对设计变量间存在的工艺约束条件使样本空间不规则且优化变量较多的问题,利用聚类分析进行试验设计确定训练近似模型需要的样本点,并用高斯过程回归方法建立近似模型以减少计算时间,验证模型R2在0.9以上。两步优化后,对比复合材料初始铺层各性能指标均有不同程度改善,复合材料质量减少11.4%;对比原钢制控制臂,各性能均满足要求,质量降低37.1%。Abstract: The layup structure in 4 areas of the suspension control arm of passenger car by using carbon fiber composite is optimized. Firstly, the layer thickness of each angle was regarded as the designing variable to optimize the modal frequency, quality and strain energy under each working condition of control arm. Then the modal frequency was regarded as the target, and the bending stiffness parameter was used as the designing variable to optimize the layup order. Based on the design of experimental of cluster analysis method, the sample points of the approximate model were determined. The Gaussian process regression method was used to establish the approximate model to save the computation cost, and the value of R2 in verification model was above 0.9. After two-step optimization, the performance indexes of the initial designing plan are improved to some extent and the composite materials are reduced by 11.4%. Comparing with the steel control arm, the mass is reduced by 37.1% to meet all the requirements.
-
Key words:
- composite /
- optimization /
- design of experiment /
- approximate model
-
表 1 碳纤维复合材料力学性能
材料性能 数值 材料性能 数值 0拉伸模量E1/GPa 138 90°拉伸模量E2/GPa 11 0拉伸强度XT/MPa 1500 90°拉伸强度YT/MPa 27 0压缩强度Xc/MPa 900 90°压缩强度Yc/MPa 200 剪切模量G12 /GPa 5.5 剪切强度S/MPa 80 主泊松比ν12 0.28 次泊松比ν23 0.4 表 2 复合材料控制臂初始铺层计算结果
参数 响应 结果 要求 备注 模态频率/Hz 1阶 409.3 >400 满足要求 2阶 496.5 − − 3阶 597.4 − − 单轮升起 应变能/J 0.1231 − − 安全系数 5.435 >1 满足要求 右转向 应变能/J 0.3212 − − 安全系数 3.226 >1 满足要求 前进制动 应变能/J 0.3451 − − 安全系数 4.292 >1 满足要求 后退单后轮制动 应变能/J 0.3790 − − 安全系数 3.559 >1 满足要求 前进单前轮制动 应变能/J 0.1427 − − 安全系数 5.848 >1 满足要求 表 3 厚度优化近似模型误差分析
响应 R2 最大误差/% 质量 0.999 4 0.22 1阶模态 0.922 0 5.15 应变能 0.956 9 5.47 表 4 铺层厚度优化结果
mm 区域 0 45° 90° −45° AB 0.4 0.5 1.1 0.4 AC 0.3 0.5 1.1 0.5 BC 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.6 P 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 表 5 铺层厚度优化前后对比
铺层 1阶频
率/Hz单轮升起/J 右转弯/J 前进制动/J 后退单后轮制动/J 前进单前轮制动/J 总应变能/J 复合材料质量/kg 初始 409.3 0.123 0.321 0.345 0.379 0.143 1.311 0.81 优化后 预测值 424.7 − − − − − 1.137 0.72 计算值 427.3 0.101 0.261 0.319 0.375 0.137 1.193 0.72 误差/% 0.06 − − − − − 4.69 0 变化比/% 4.4 −17.9 −18.7 −7.5 −1.1 −4.2 −9.0 −11.4 表 6 样本点响应变化范围
响应 变化范围 1阶模态频率/Hz 31.63 2阶模态频率/Hz 61.30 3阶模态频率/Hz 21.31 总应变能/J 0.019 7 表 7 顺序优化近似模型验证结果
1阶 2阶 3阶 R2 0.974 5 0.990 6 0.941 6 最大误差/% 0.54 0.43 0.25 表 8 优化后铺层顺序
区域 $\xi^{D}_{1} $ $\xi^{D}_{2} $ $\xi^{D}_{3} $ 铺层结构 AB −0.031 −0.512 0.173 [45/(±45)2/452/−452/(90/0)2/903/0/904/0/ 902]s AC −0.192 −0.600 0.077 [452/−453/453/90/−452/904/(0/903)2/0]s BC −0.003 0.035 0.012 [0/−45/90/0/−45/452/90/0/452/90/−45/902/45/90/−45/90/−45/±45/90/45/90]s P 0.562 0.188 −0.138 [04/45/0/−453/45/(−452/90)2/902/45/90]s 表 9 铺层顺序优化前后对比
Hz 1阶 2阶 3阶 优化前 427.3 526.2 607.5 优化后 437.7 547.0 620.1 变化量 10.4 20.8 12.5 表 10 SAPH440与复合材料控制臂对比
参数 响应 SAPH440 复合材料 变化比/% 模态频率/Hz 1阶 560.6 437.7 −21.9 2阶 735.1 547.0 −25.5 3阶 814.7 620.1 −23.9 单轮升起 应变能/J 0.977 0.101 3.5 安全系数 4.59 7.69 67.5 右转弯 应变能/J 0.216 0.261 20.5 安全系数 2.78 5.00 79.9 前进制动 应变能/J 1.094 0.319 −70.8 安全系数 1.82 5.88 223.1 后退单后轮制动 应变能/J 1.757 0.375 −78.7 安全系数 1.38 3.13 126.8 前进单前轮制动 应变能/J 0.572 0.137 −76.0 安全系数 2.45 5.26 114.7 质量/kg − 1.97 1.24 −37.1 -
[1] 张君媛, 姜哲, 李仲玉, 等. 基于抗撞性的汽车B柱碳纤维加强板优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2018, 40(10): 1166-1171, 1178ZHANG J Y, JIANG Z, LI Z Y, et al. Optimization design of vehicle CFRP B-pillar stiffening panel for crashworthiness[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1166-1171, 1178 (in Chinese) [2] 乔巍, 姚卫星. 复合材料加筋板铺层优化设计的等效弯曲刚度法[J]. 计算力学学报, 2011, 28(1): 158-162 doi: 10.7511/jslx201101028QIAO W, YAO W X. Equivalent bending stiffness method for stacking sequence optimization of composite stiffened panel[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2011, 28(1): 158-162 (in Chinese) doi: 10.7511/jslx201101028 [3] 冯雁, 郑锡涛, 吴淑一, 等. 轻型复合材料机翼铺层优化设计与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(6): 1858-1866FENG Y, ZHENG X T, WU S Y, et al. Layup optimization design and analysis of super lightweight composite wing[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(6): 1858-1866 (in Chinese) [4] HERENCIA J E, WEAVER P M, FRISWEL M I. Optimization of long anisotropic laminated fiber composite panels with T-shaped stiffeners[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(10): 2497-2509 [5] LIU X Y, FEATHERSTON C A, KENNEDY D. Two-level layup optimization of composite laminate using lamination parameters[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 211: 337-350 doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.054 [6] 刘哲, 金达锋, 范志瑞. 基于代理模型的复合材料带加强筋板铺层优化[J]. 清华大学学报, 2015, 55(7): 782-789LIU Z, JIN D F, FAN Z R. Laminate optimization of a composite stiffened panel based on surrogate model[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2015, 55(7): 782-789 (in Chinese) [7] GHIASI H, PASINI D, LESSARD L. Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials Part I: constant stiffness design[J]. Composite Structures, 2009, 90(1): 1-11 [8] 龙腾, 刘建, WANG G Gary, 等. 基于计算试验设计与代理模型的飞行器近似优化策略探讨[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(14): 79-105 doi: 10.3901/JME.2016.14.079LONG T, LIU J, WANG G G, et al. Discuss on approximate optimization strategies using design of computer experiments and metamodels for flight vehicle design[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(14): 79-105 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3901/JME.2016.14.079 [9] WARD Jr J H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963, 58(301): 236-244 [10] 杨志恒. 基于Ward法的区域空间聚类分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(3): 382-386YANG Z H. Region spatial cluster algorithm based on ward method[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(3): 382-386 (in Chinese) [11] JOSEPH V R, GUL E, BA S. Maximum projection designs for computer experiments[J]. Biometrika, 2015, 102(2): 371-380 [12] 何志昆, 刘光斌, 赵曦晶, 等. 高斯过程回归方法综述[J]. 控制与决策, 2013, 28(8): 1121-1129, 1137HE Z K, LIU G B, ZHAO X J, et al. Overview of Gaussian process regression[J]. Control and Decision, 2013, 28(8): 1121-1129, 1137 (in Chinese) [13] 张志飞, 陈仁, 徐中明, 等. 面向多目标的汽车悬架控制臂拓扑优化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(4): 114-121 doi: 10.3901/JME.2017.04.114ZHANG Z F, CHEN R, XU Z M, et al. Research on multi-objective topology optimization of vehicle suspension control arm[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(4): 114-121 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3901/JME.2017.04.114 [14] 小林明. 汽车工程手册[M]. 汽车工程手册编译委员会, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1984.XIAO L M. Automotive engineers' hand book[M]. Automotive Engineering Manual Compilation Committee, trans. Beijing: China Machine Press, 1984 (in Chinese) [15] 龚友坤, 王韬, 姚远, 等. 汽车底盘碳纤维后纵臂成形实验与分析[J]. 汽车工程, 2016, 38(2): 248-251, 241 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-680X.2016.02.019GONG Y K, WANG T, YAO Y. Forming experiment and analysis of vehicle rear longitudinal arm of carbon fiber reinforced composite[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 248-251, 241 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-680X.2016.02.019 [16] 王耀先. 复合材料力学与结构设计[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2012.WANG Y X. Mechanics and structural design of composite materials[M]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology Press, 2012 (in Chinese). [17] SODEN P D, HINTON M J, KADDOUR A S. Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 1998, 58(7): 1011-1022 [18] 中国航空研究院. 复合材料结构设计手册[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2001.Chinese Aeronautical Establishment. Composite structure design manual[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2001 (in Chinese)