Study on Work Hardening Degree in Ultrasonic Rolling Extrusion of 42CrMo Bearing Steel
-
摘要: 为探究超声滚挤压强化对42CrMo轴承钢表面加工硬化程度的影响,本文通过正交试验、极差分析、方差分析探究各工艺参数对加工硬化程度的影响规律、显著性和贡献率,采用逐步回归的方法构建超声滚挤压表面加工硬化程度预测模型。研究表明:超声振幅和静压力是影响42CrMo材料应变的主要因素,而工件转速和进给速度影响应变的分布;振幅表面加工硬化程度影响最大,贡献率达到了71.61%,进给速度最小,贡献率仅为0.41%;表面硬化程度随超声振幅、静压力增大而增大,随工件转速的增大先增大后减小,随进给速度增大缓慢减小;基于逐步回归预测模型获得的加工硬化程度值与实测值基本一致,所构建的预测模型整体显著性较强具有很高的可靠性和预测能力。Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of the ultrasonic rolling extrusion on the surface work hardening of 42CrMo bearing steel. With the orthogonal test, range analysis and variance analysis, the influence rule, significance and contribution rate of the process parameters on the work hardening degree were explored, and the prediction model for the work hardening degree of the ultrasonic roll extrusion surface was established with the stepwise regression method. The results show that the ultrasonic amplitude and static pressure are the main factors affecting the strain of 42CrMo bearing steel, while the rotational speed and feed speed of workpiece affect the strain distribution; the amplitude surface work hardening degree has the greatest influence, the contribution rate is of 71.61%, the feed speed is the smallest, the contribution rate is only of 0.41%; the surface hardening degree increases with the increasing of ultrasonic amplitude and static pressure, and increases firstly with the increasing of workpiece rotational speed. The prediction model based on the stepwise regression prediction model is basically consistent with the measured results, and the prediction model has strong overall significance, high reliability and prediction ability.
-
Key words:
- ultrasonic rolling extrusion /
- 42CrMo /
- work hardening degree /
- orthogonal test /
- stepwise regression
-
表 1 材料42CrMo中各元素的质量分数
% 元素 C Mn Cr Mo Si Ni P Fe 所占比例 0.37 0.77 0.98 0.21 0.15 0.04 0.03 97.41 表 2 超声滚挤压工艺参数
水平次序 n/(r·min−1) f/(mm·min−1) A/μm F/N 1 100 10 6 150 2 225 22 10 225 3 350 34 15 375 4 475 46 20 525 5 600 60 25 630 表 3 正交试验结果
序号 n f A F 硬度HV 加工硬化程度NH 1 1 1 1 1 667.16 105.76% 2 1 2 2 2 679.32 107.68% 3 1 3 3 3 695.08 110.18% 4 1 4 4 4 703.65 111.54% 5 1 5 5 5 710.84 112.68% 6 2 1 2 3 692.69 109.80% 7 2 2 3 4 703.93 111.58% 8 2 3 4 5 711.53 112.79% 9 2 4 5 1 701.27 111.16% 10 2 5 1 2 674.08 106.85% 11 3 1 3 5 709.44 112.46% 12 3 2 4 1 698.31 110.69% 13 3 3 5 2 707.85 112.21% 14 3 4 1 3 682.74 108.23% 15 3 5 2 4 697.50 110.56% 16 4 1 4 2 705.99 111.91% 17 4 2 5 3 715.22 113.37% 18 4 3 1 4 690.02 109.38% 19 4 4 2 5 700.63 111.06% 20 4 5 3 1 694.53 110.09% 21 5 1 5 4 719.36 114.03% 22 5 2 1 5 689.70 109.33% 23 5 3 2 1 685.71 108.70% 24 5 4 3 2 696.03 110.33% 25 5 5 4 3 705.93 111.90% K1j 109.568% 110.791% 107.909% 109.281% − − K2j 110.438% 110.532% 109.561% 109.797% − − K3j 110.829% 110.651% 110.930% 110.697% − − K4j 111.164% 110.464% 111.767% 111.420% − − K5j 110.858% 110.419% 112.691% 111.663% − − Rj 1.596% 0.373% 4.782% 2.382% − − 排序 3 4 1 2 − − 表 4 方差分析
因素 偏差平方和 自由度 均方差 F比值 贡献率/% n 7.96×10−4 4 0.000199 244.219 7.78 f 4.5×10−5 4 0.000011 13.830 0.41 A 7.309×10−3 4 0.001827 2241.066 71.61 F 2.045×10−3 4 0.000511 627.081 20.01 误差 6.52×10−6 8 8.15×10−7 − 0.19 总和 1.020 2×10−2 24 − − 100 表 5 验证试验结果
序号 n/(r·min−1) f//(mm·min−1) A/μm F/N 加工硬化
程度NH/%1 600 22 25 375 113.75 2 475 34 15 525 111.66 3 350 46 6 630 109.48 4 225 34 6 225 107.77 5 100 10 10 225 107.96 -
[1] 苏连成, 李兴林, 李小俚, 等. 风电机组轴承的状态监测和故障诊断与运行维护[J]. 轴承, 2012,(1): 47-53 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3762.2012.01.015Su L C, Li X L, Li X L, et al. Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis and operating maintenance systems for wind turbine bearings[J]. Bearing, 2012,(1): 47-53 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3762.2012.01.015 [2] 翟晶, 王曰辉, 柴希. 风电齿轮箱轴承检修中的判定综述[J]. 机械研究与应用, 2017, 30(5): 133-134, 137Zhai J, Wang Y H, Chai X. Determine review on the overhauling of wind turbine gearbox bearings[J]. Mechanical Research & Application, 2017, 30(5): 133-134, 137 (in Chinese) [3] 郑建新, 罗傲梅, 刘传绍. 超声表面强化技术的研究进展[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2012,(10): 32-36 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2402.2012.10.012Zheng J X, Luo A M, Liu C S. Development of ultrasonic surface enhancement technique[J]. Manufacturing Technology & Machine Tool, 2012,(10): 32-36 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2402.2012.10.012 [4] 陈利钦, 项彬, 任学冲, 等. 表面超声滚压处理工艺对高速列车车轴钢表面状态的影响[J]. 中国表面工程, 2014, 27(5): 96-101Chen L Q, Xiang B, Ren X C, et al. Influences of surface ultrasonic rolling processing parameters on surface condition of axle steel used in high speed trains[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2014, 27(5): 96-101 (in Chinese) [5] 王义, 佟宇, 鲍绍箕. 超声振动挤压工艺与常规挤压工艺的对比分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 1994, 34(5): 573-577Wang Y, Tong Y, Bao S J. Investigation of difference between ultrasonic and normal extrusion technique[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 1994, 34(5): 573-577 (in Chinese) [6] 叶寒, 赖刘生, 李骏, 等. 超声滚压强化7075铝合金工件表面性能的研究[J]. 表面技术, 2018, 47(2): 8-13Ye H, Lai L S, Li J, et al. Surface properties of 7075 aluminum alloy workpieces after ultrasonic burnishing processing[J]. Surface Technology, 2018, 47(2): 8-13 (in Chinese) [7] 赵运才, 张飞. 静压力对超声滚压表层特性的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2017, 46(5): 152-158Zhao Y C, Zhang F. Effect of static pressure on surface characteristics of ultrasonic rolling[J]. Surface Technology, 2017, 46(5): 152-158 (in Chinese) [8] 王婷, 王东坡, 刘刚, 等. 40Cr超声表面滚压加工纳米化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2009, 45(5): 177-183 doi: 10.3901/JME.2009.05.177Wang T, Wang D P, Liu G, et al. 40Cr Nano-crystallization by ultrasonic surface rolling extrusion processing[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(5): 177-183 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3901/JME.2009.05.177 [9] Liu Y, Zhao X H, Wang D P. Determination of the plastic properties of materials treated by ultrasonic surface rolling process through instrumented indentation[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014, 600: 21-31 doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.096 [10] Lee C S, Cho I S, Pyoun Y S, et al. Study of inner micro cracks on rolling contact fatigue of bearing steels using ultrasonic Nano-crystalline surface modification[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2011, 462-463: 979-984 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.462-463.979 [11] Zhang Q J, Cao J G, Wang H Y. Ultrasonic surface strengthening of train axle material 30CrMoA[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 42: 853-857 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.007 [12] Lu L X, Sun J, Li L, et al. Study on surface characteristics of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy by ultrasonic surface rolling process[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 87(9-12): 2533-2539 doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-8659-4 [13] 蔡振, 张显程, 涂善东. 超声表面滚压加工对Ti-6Al-4V合金显微组织及表面完整性的影响[J]. 机械工程材料, 2018, 42(1): 7-10, 17 doi: 10.11973/jxgccl201801002Cai Z, Zhang X C, Tu S D. Effects of ultrasonic surface rolling process on microstructure and surface integrity of Ti-6Al-4V alloy[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 42(1): 7-10, 17 (in Chinese) doi: 10.11973/jxgccl201801002 [14] 张勤俭, 王会英, 刘月明, 等. 30CrMoA车轴材料超声表面挤压强化技术研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(S1): 177-184Zhang Q J, Wang H Y, Liu Y M, et al. The research of 30CrMoA axle material by ultrasonic surface extrusion strengthening processing[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(S1): 177-184 (in Chinese) [15] 郑建新, 刘威成, 段玉涛. 7075铝合金二维超声挤压加工表面质量影响因素及其交互作用研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(6): 1231-1238 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.06.024Zheng J X, Liu W C, Duan Y T. Interaction effects of processing parameters on surface quality of two-dimensional ultrasonically extruded 7075 aluminum alloy[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(6): 1231-1238 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.06.024 [16] 刘洁. 超声滚压加工对改善金属表面性能的研究[D]. 山东青岛: 青岛科技大学, 2013Liu J. Ultrasonic surface rolling processing research to improve the metal properties[D]. Shandong Qingdao: Qingdao University of Science & Technology, 2013 (in Chinese) [17] 朱松松, 李同春, 冯旭松, 等. 基于有限元法和逐步回归法的泵站位移统计模型构建方法[J]. 水利水电技术, 2018, 49(2): 49-55Zhu S S, Li T C, Feng X S, et al. Finite element method and stepwise regression method-based method for constructing displacement statistical model of pumping station[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2018, 49(2): 49-55 (in Chinese)