Dynamic Modeling and Quality Optimization of Five-axis Machining Center
-
摘要: 为了解五轴联动加工中心结构件质量对整机性能的影响规律,结合集中参数法和子结构综合法建立整机动力学模型。依据五轴联动加工中心拓扑结构特点,基于子结构综合思想,将其分为两个拓扑子链并分别开展影响规律分析;基于结构件间的质量关系,提出了机床质量匹配度的评价指标-结构件质量比(RT)。通过分别对刀具链和工件链中结构件质量进行匹配优化,获得整机的质量匹配优化方案,并基于有限元仿真软件对优化结果进行验证。结果显示,通过该优化方法,整机质量减轻10.3%,整机首阶固有频率提高3.9%。Abstract: Aiming to reveal the influence rules of the parts′ masses of five-axis machining center on the whole machine performance, the dynamic model for the five axis machine center was established by combining the centralized parameter method and the substructure, According to the characteristics of topological structure of five-axis machining center, and the idea of substructure synthesis, it is divided into two sub-chains. Furthermore, the influence law is carried out. After analyzing the relations of each part′ mass of the sub-chain assembly, the evaluation index of machine tool inertia matching-mass ratio is proposed. Based on the optimization result of the inertia matching of tool-chain and part-chain, the mass optimization scheme of the whole machine is obtained. The optimization result is verified by the finite element simulation software. The results show that the mass of the whole machine is reduced by 10.3% and the first-order natural frequency is increased by 3.9%.
-
图 4 初始位置(图 1)整机首阶振型
图 10 初始位置(图 1)质量匹配优化后整机首阶振型
表 1 系统低序体阵列
阵列 结构件名称(编号) 横床身(0) 工作台(1) 工件(2) 纵床身(3) 立柱(4) 溜板(5) B轴摆架(6) 主轴箱(7) L0(i) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L1(i) - 0 1 0 3 4 5 6 L2(i) - - 0 - 0 3 4 5 L3(i) - - - - - 0 3 4 L4(i) - - - - - - 0 3 L5(i) - - - - - - - 0 L6(i) - - - - - - - - L7(i) - - - - - - - - 表 2 五轴联动加工中心惯量参数
部件 IX/(g·m2) IY/(g·m2) IZ/(g·m2) M/g 横床身 223 5 491 5 400 9 062 工作台 37 255 289 4 133 纵床身 276 312 51 3 010 滑座 26 46 23 1 472 立柱 6 672 2 775 6 229 9 857 溜板 429 480 606 2 097 B轴摆架 165 167 130 984 主轴箱 61 26 48 477 表 3 结合面刚度参数
部件 kx/(N·m-1) ky/(N·m-1) kz/(N·m-1) kxx/(N·m·rad-1) kyy/(N·m·rad-1) kzz/(N·m·rad-1) 横床身-地面 1×109 1×109 1×109 2.6×105 2.6×105 2.6×105 工作台-横床身 6.5×107 4.7×108 3.6×108 2×105 2.6×105 2.6×105 纵床身-地面 1×109 1×109 1×109 2.6×105 2.6×105 2.6×105 纵床身-横床身 1×107 1×107 1×107 1.2×104 1.2×104 1.2×104 纵床身-滑座 4.5×108 6.7×108 6.5×107 2.6×105 2.6×105 2×105 滑座-立柱 5.5×108 5.5×108 5.5×108 2.6×105 2.6×105 2.6×105 立柱-溜板 6.2×108 6.5×107 3.7×108 2.6×105 2×105 2.6×105 溜板- B轴摆架 3.5×108 3.5×108 1.3×107 6.6×107 6.6×104 2.6×104 B轴摆架-主轴箱 2.6×107 3.3×108 3.3×108 2.6×104 2.6×105 2.6×105 表 4 工件链结构件质量样本
部件 m/kg 数目 横床身 7 249.6:90.62:10 874.4 41 工作台 3 306.4:41.33:4 959.6 41 表 5 刀具链结构件质量样本
部件 m/kg 数目 纵床身 3 585.6:224.1:5 378.4 9 滑座+立柱 7 885.6:492.85:11 728.4 9 溜板 1 677.6:104.85:2 516.4 9 B轴摆架 787.2:49.2:1 180.8 9 主轴箱 381.6:23.85:572.4 9 表 6 刀具链优化结果
名称 方案1 方案2 方案3 方案4 方案5 纵床身 1 1 0.85 1 0.85 滑座+立柱 1 1 1 1 1 溜板 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.8 0.8 B轴摆架 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 主轴箱 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.85 0.85 f1 16.40 16.40 16.46 16.46 16.40 表 7 刀具链优化结果质量属性
部件 质量/kg 变化比 质量比 横床身 7 249.6 0.8 - 工作台 3 306.4 0.8 2.19 纵床身 3 010 1 - 滑座+立柱 10 438 0.8 0.28 溜板 2 516.4 1.2 4.14 B轴摆架 787.2 0.8 3.19 主轴箱 572.4 1.2 1.37 -
[1] LAW M, Altintas Y, Phani A S. Rapid evaluation and optimization of machine tools with position-dependent stability[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2013, 68:81-90 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.02.003 [2] 赵万华, 张星, 吕盾, 等.国产数控机床的技术现状与对策[J].航空制造技术, 2016(9):16-22 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKGJ201609003.htmZHAO W H, ZHANG X, LV D, et al. Technical status and strategies for domestic CNC machine tools[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2016(9):16-22 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKGJ201609003.htm [3] JIA Z Y, MA J W, SONG D N, et al. A review of contouring-error reduction method in multi-axis CNC machining[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2018, 125:34-54 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.10.008 [4] 宋智勇, 李晴朝, 姜忠, 等.CNC机床动态特性与S形试件轮廓误差映射关系分析[J].中国机械工程, 2016, 27(23):3157-3161, 3166 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2016.23.006SONG Z Y, LI Q Z, JIANG Z, et al. Analysis for mapping relationship among CNC machine dynamic performance and s-shaped specimen contour errors[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 27(23):3157-3161, 3166 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2016.23.006 [5] 刘辉, 黄莹, 赵万华, 等.多因素耦合条件下数控机床进给系统负载惯量比的综合分析与设计[J].机械工程学报, 2014, 50(9):108-113 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201409016.htmLIU H, HUANG Y, ZHAO W H, et al. Comprehensive analysis and design of load inertia ratio of machine tools feed drive under the condition of multi-factors coupling[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(9):108-113 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201409016.htm [6] 李天箭, 吴晨帆, 沈磊, 等.基于模态预测及敏度分析的机床动特性设计方法[J].机械工程学报, 2019, 55(7):178-186 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201907026.htmLI T J, WU C F, SHEN L, et al. Improving machine tool dynamic performance using modal prediction and sensitivity analysis method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(7):178-186 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201907026.htm [7] 吴文镜, 刘强.机床动力学建模的拓展传递矩阵法[J].机械工程学报, 2010, 46(21):69-75 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201021012.htmWU W J, LIU Q. Extended transfer matrix method for dynamic modeling of machine tools[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(21):69-75 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201021012.htm [8] LAW M, PHANI A S, ALTINTAS Y. Position-dependent multibody dynamic modeling of machine tools based on improved reduced order models[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2013, 135(2):021008 doi: 10.1115/1.4023453 [9] 诸赟, 张美艳, 唐国安.一种基于子结构界面动刚度的模态综合法[J].振动工程学报, 2015, 28(3):345-351 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDGC201503002.htmZHU Y, ZHANG M Y, TANG G A. A modal synthesis method based upon dynamic stiffness on interface[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2015, 28(3):345-351 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDGC201503002.htm [10] 落海伟, 张俊, 王辉, 等.3-RPS并联机构静刚度建模方法[J].天津大学学报, 2015, 48(9):797-803 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDX201509008.htmLUO H W, ZHANG J, WANG H, et al. Static stiffness modeling method of 3-RPS PKM[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2015, 48(9):797-803 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDX201509008.htm [11] ZHANG J, ZHAO Y Q, JIN Y. Elastodynamic modeling and analysis for an exechon parallel kinematic machine[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, 2016, 138(3):031011 doi: 10.1115/1.4030938 [12] 郭垒, 张辉, 叶佩青, 等.基于灵敏度分析的机床轻量化设计[J].清华大学学报, 2011, 51(6):846-850 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXB201106025.htmGUO L, ZHANG H, YE P Q, et al. Light weight design of a machine tool based on sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2011, 51(6):846-850 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXB201106025.htm [13] ZULAIKA J J, CAMPA F J, DE LACALLE L N L. An integrated process-machine approach for designing productive and lightweight milling machines[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2011, 51(7-8):591-604 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.04.003 [14] 薛令军.精密卧式加工中心结构件质量匹配设计方法[D].天津: 天津大学, 2014XUE L J. Mass matching design method for structural components of precession horizontal machining center[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2014 (in Chinese) [15] 信桂锁, 薄瑞峰, 冯超, 等.基于多岛遗传算法和响应面模型的机床床身的轻量化设计[J].机械设计与研究, 2017, 33(5):102-106 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYY201705030.htmXIN G S, BO R F, FENG C, et al. Lightweight design of machine tool body base on MIGA method and response surface model[J]. Machine Design and Research, 2017, 33(5):102-106 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSYY201705030.htm [16] 张曙, 张柄生.机床的总体配置和结构设计(下)[J].机械设计与制造工程, 2016, 45(4):1-10 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXZZ201604001.htmZHANG S, ZHANG B S. The configuration and structure design of machine tool (Ⅱ)[J]. Machine Design and Manufacturing Engineering, 2016, 45(4):1-10 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXZZ201604001.htm