A Dual-Mode Prediction Model for Exhaust Temperature of Natural Gas Scroll Compressor
-
摘要: 为了能够准确预测出天然气涡旋压缩机的排气温度,建立了实验系统,并针对主要部位进行了温度测量。通过建立多元回归预测模型、灰色预测模型和双预测模型对温度进行了分析,研究了入口温度,主轴转速,压力比等主要因素对排气温度的影响,并评估了模型的准确性,最终对不同运行状态下的排气温度进行预测、分析。结果表明:多元回归预测的误差为3.06%,灰色预测的误差为2.11%,双模预测的误差为1.69%,可见双模预测误差最小,稳定性最强;在影响排气温度的因素中,入口温度的影响程度最大,其次是主轴转速,压力比最小。Abstract: To accurately predict the exhaust temperature of a natural gas scroll compressor, an experimental system was established and the temperature in the main part of the scroll compressor was measured. By analyzing the temperature data, a multiple regression prediction model, a gray prediction model and a dual-mode prediction model were set up. Based on these models, the influence of such factors as inlet temperature, spindle speed and pressure ratio on the exhaust temperature are explored. Moreover, the accuracy of these models was evaluated. Finally, the exhaust temperature under different operating conditions is predicted and analyzed. The results show that the error of the multiple regression prediction model is 3.06%, the error of the gray prediction model is 2.11% and the error of the dual-mode prediction model is 1.69%. The dual-mode prediction model has the smallest error and the strongest stability. In addition, among the factors which affect exhaust temperature, the inlet temperature has the most apparent influence on the result, the spindle speed is the second and the pressure ratio is the smallest.
-
表 1 样本数据
参数 样本 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 出口温度/℃ 51 53 64 84 106 137 139 138 138 150 152 入口温度/℃ 23.5 24.0 24.0 24.5 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.0 27.0 主轴转速/(r·min-1) 1 320 1 320 1 320 1 980 1 980 2 640 2 640 2 640 2 640 3 300 3 300 压力比 1.39 1.33 1.79 1.83 2.21 2.95 3.00 3.15 3.15 4.38 4.39 表 2 多元回归预测模型指标
参数名 系数 Sig 常数 0.63 T1>n>r R2=0.969 4 0.000 1 入口温度T1 -1.092 0.000 1 主轴转速n 0.940 3 F=44.68 0.000 1 压力比r 0.305 4 0.000 1 表 3 灰色模型指标临界值
精度等级 指标临界值 σ ε C P 一级 0.01 0.90 0.35 0.95 二级 0.05 0.80 0.50 0.80 三级 0.10 0.70 0.65 0.70 四级 0.20 0.60 0.80 0.60 表 4 3种模型误差对比
模型 误差/% 多元回归 3.04 灰色预测 2.11 双预测模型 1.69 表 5 入口温度为单一变量时的排气温度(主轴转速n=1 980~2 130 r/min,压力比r=2.3~2.6)
参数 样本 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 入口温度/℃ 16.75 18.76 20.82 22.81 24.78 26.65 28.62 30.60 多元预测/℃ 64.54 77.51 89.20 96.55 106.12 114.31 120.59 134.87 灰色预测/℃ 64.54 80.57 87.80 95.68 104.30 113.60 123.80 134.90 双模预测/℃ 64.54 79.04 88.50 96.12 105.21 113.96 122.19 134.89 表 6 主轴转速为单一变量时的排气温度(入口温度T1=22 ℃~23 ℃,压力比r=2.3~2.6)
参数 样本 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 主轴转速/(r·min-1) 660 1 320 1 650 1 980 2 310 2 640 2 970 3 300 多元预测/℃ 31.54 68.93 92.39 104.27 118.09 128.09 146.22 162.99 灰色预测/℃ 32.28 68.80 94.50 108.10 125.30 133.80 142.70 149.20 双模预测/℃ 31.91 68.87 93.45 106.19 121.70 130.95 144.46 156.10 表 7 压力比为单一变量时的排气温度(入口温度T1=22 ℃~23 ℃,主轴转速n=1 980~2 130 r/min)
参数 样本 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 压力比 1.42 1.86 2.17 2.59 2.91 3.23 3.89 5.12 多元预测/℃ 55.24 65.82 92.70 94.26 107.90 128.84 134.22 145.49 灰色预测/℃ 56.82 75.66 85.30 96.17 108.42 122.24 137.82 155.35 双模预测/℃ 56.03 70.74 89.00 95.22 108.16 125.54 136.02 150.42 -
[1] 肖江涛.天然气压缩机密封系统常见故障研究[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(8):30-31 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96877B/20198/7002174318.htmlXiao J T. Study on common faults of natural gas compressor sealing system[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2019, 39(8):30-31(in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96877B/20198/7002174318.html [2] 彭斌, 赵生显, 李要红.新型无油涡旋压缩机性能[J].中国机械工程, 2018, 29(24):2917-2924Peng B, Zhao S X, Li Y H. Performances of new oil-free scroll compressors[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 29(24):2917-2924(in Chinese) [3] 何俊, 陶乐仁, 虞中旸.R32转子式压缩机改良排气温度的方法探究[J].建筑节能, 2018, 46(5):120-124 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93987B/20185/675227251.htmlHe J, Tao L R, Yu A Y. Approach to improving exhaust temperature of R32 rotary compressor[J]. Building Energy Efficiency, 2008, 46(5):120-124(in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93987B/20185/675227251.html [4] 束江军.螺杆空气压缩机机头排气温度偏高的处理[J].内蒙古科技与经济, 2014, (5):101, 103 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-NMKJ201405047.htmShu J J. Treatment of high exhaust temperature of screw air compressor head[J]. Inner Mongolia Science Technology and Economy, 2014, (5):101, 103(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-NMKJ201405047.htm [5] 矢岛龙三郎, 吉见敦史, 朴春成.降低R32压缩机排气温度的方法[J].制冷与空调, 2011, 11(2):60-64 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/87644X/201102/37731591.htmlYajima R, Yoshimi A, Piao C S. Methods to reduce the exhaust temperature of R32 compressor[J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2011, 11(2):60-64(in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/87644X/201102/37731591.html [6] 王林忠, 吴献忠.R32热泵系统排气温度控制及理论预测[J].制冷与空调, 2014, 14(6):51-55 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZLDT201406015.htmWang L Z, Wu X Z. Discharge temperature control in heat pump system using R32 and its theoretical prediction[J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2014, 14(6):51-55(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZLDT201406015.htm [7] 唐景春, 左承基.降低汽车空调涡旋压缩机排气温度的结构分析[J].中国机械工程, 2012, 23(2):248-250 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGJX201202028.htmTang J C, Zuo C J. Structural analysis to reduce discharge temperature for vehicle air-conditioning scroll compressor[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 23(2):248-250(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGJX201202028.htm [8] 范廷宾, 王明.火烧云铅锌矿矿石小块体重多元线性回归模型建立及检验[J].地质学刊, 2017, 41(3):409-414 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsdz201703007Fan T B, Wang M. Establishment and examination of multiple linear regression model of small volumetric weight in the Huoshaoyun lead-zinc deposit[J]. Journal of Geology, 2017, 41(3):409-414(in Chinese) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsdz201703007 [9] 刘涛, 张文超, 张文帅.变截面涡旋盘齿面粗糙度的双预测模型[J].表面技术, 2019, 48(8):323-329 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BMJS201908043.htmLiu T, Zhang W C, Zhang W S. Double-predictive model of tooth surface roughness of variable-section scroll[J]. Surface Technology, 2019, 48(8):323-329(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BMJS201908043.htm [10] 王德意, 朱玉清, 林涛.灰色系统理论在桩基竖向荷载试验中的预测应用研究[J].低温建筑技术, 2019, 41(5):126-130 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=TGJC201903031Wang D Y, Zhu Y Q, Lin T. Prediction application for the bearing capacity of pile loading-test by the grey system theory[J]. Low Temperature Architecture Technology, 2019, 41(5):126-130(in Chinese) http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=TGJC201903031 [11] 刘思峰, 杨英杰.灰色系统研究进展(2004-2014)[J].南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47(1):1-18 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/92509X/201501/664083297.htmlLiu S F, Yang Y J. Advances in grey system research (2004-2014)[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 47(1):1-18(in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/92509X/201501/664083297.html [12] Qiao X H, Zhang Z J, Jiang X L, et al. Application of grey theory in pollution prediction on insulator surface in power systems[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 106:104153 doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104153 [13] Zhou Q H, Lin L Q, Chen G, et al. Prediction and optimization of electrospun polyacrylonitrile fiber diameter based on grey system theory[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(14):2237 doi: 10.3390/ma12142237 [14] 毕永.高级计算器在灰色预测GM(1, 1)模型精度检验中的使用[J].世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(30):270-271 http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71612X/201930/87777365504849575148495256.htmlBi Y. Application of advanced calculator in the precision test of grey prediction GM(1, 1) model[J]. World Latest Medicine Information, 2019, 19(30):270-271(in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71612X/201930/87777365504849575148495256.html [15] 王亚.灰色预测模型的改进及其在电力行业中的应用[J].许昌学院学报, 2018, 37(6):68-72 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xcxyxb201806017Wang Y. The improvement of grey prediction model and its application in power sector[J]. Journal of Xuchang University, 2018, 37(6):68-72(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xcxyxb201806017