Exploring Influence of Structural Parameters of Magnetorheological Damper's Damping Channel on Response Time
-
摘要: 通过ANSYS软件进行磁场仿真得出了不同磁流体通道间隙,磁极长度,磁极形状以及磁回路厚度下磁流变阻尼器磁感应强度随时间变化的曲线图。通过分析磁场仿真结果得出:随着磁流体通道间隙的增加,其响应时间呈上升趋势;随着磁极长度的增加,其响应时间减小;磁极表面有不同形状,当磁极表面形状为平面且有圆弧倒角时其响应时间最短;活塞磁场未饱和时,随着磁回路的厚度的增加其响应时间增大,当活塞磁场饱和时,磁回路的厚度对磁流变阻尼器的响应时间不会产生影响。Abstract: The simulation of magnetic field with ANSYS software is carried out to obtain the curve diagram of the magnetic induction intensity of the magnetorheological damper under the conditions of different magnetofluid channel gaps, magnetic pole length, magnetic pole shape and magnetic loop thickness. The simulation results show that the response time of the magnetorheological damper increases with the increase of magnetic field and that the response time decreases with the increase of magnetic pole length. The response time is the shortest when the shape of the magnetic pole surface is flat and there is an arc chamfer. When the magnetic field of the piston is unsaturated, the response time increases with the increase of the thickness of the magnetic circuit, but when its magnetic field is saturated, the thickness of the magnetic loop has no effect on the response time of the magnetorheological damper.
-
Key words:
- magnetorheological damper /
- damping channel /
- magnetic field /
- simulation /
- response time
-
表 1 线圈参数
铜线长度/m 线圈电阻/Ω 加载电压/V 207.345 18.48 18.48 -
[1] El Majdoub K, Ghani D, Giri F, et al. Adaptive semi- active suspension of quarter-vehicle with magnetorheological damper[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2015, 137(2):021010 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f991b9771d7f53099b5d20d6ef7df770 [2] Chooi W W, Oyadiji S O. Experimental testing and validation of a magnetorheological (MR) damper model[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2009, 131(6):061003 http://www.researchgate.net/publication/239044655_Experimental_Testing_and_Validation_of_a_Magnetorheological_(MR)_Damper_Model [3] 张进秋, 张磊, 高永强.磁流变阻尼器响应时间仿真与试验研究[J].装甲兵工程学院学报, 2011, 25(6):29-34 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1497.2011.06.007Zhang J Q, Zhang L, Gao Y Q. Simulation and test study on response time of MRD[J]. Journal Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2011, 25(6):29-34(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1497.2011.06.007 [4] 黄曦, 余淼, 陈爱军, 等.磁流变液阻尼器动态响应及其影响因素分析[J].功能材料, 2006, 37(5):808-810, 813 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9731.2006.05.042Huang X, Yu M, Chen A J, et al. Analysis of dynamic response time of MR damper and its influential factors[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2006, 37(5):808-810, 813(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9731.2006.05.042 [5] 杨百炼, 鲁嘉, 张登友, 等.汽车磁流变阻尼器响应时间研究[J].客车技术与研究, 2010, 32(6):11-14 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3331.2010.06.004Yang B L, Lu J, Zhang D Y, et al. Study of response time of magnetorheological fluid damper[J]. Bus Technology and Research, 2010, 32(6):11-14(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3331.2010.06.004 [6] 张红辉, 廖昌荣, 陈伟民, 等.磁流变阻尼器磁路设计及磁饱和有限元分析[J].功能材料与器件学报, 2004, 10(4):493-497 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4252.2004.04.021Zhang H H, Liao C R, Chen W M, et al. Magnetic design of MR damper and FEM analysis on saturation[J]. Journal of Functional Materials and Devices, 2004, 10(4):493-497(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4252.2004.04.021 [7] 吴剑, 王洪飞.基于ANSYS的磁流变阻尼器磁路优化设计[J].机电工程, 2008, 25(2):74-76 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4551.2008.02.024Wu J, Wang H F. Magnetic circuit optimum design of a magneto-rheological damper based on ANSYS[J]. Mechanical & Electrical Engineering Magazine, 2008, 25(2):74-76(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4551.2008.02.024 [8] 孙宁, 张琳, 田玲.基于ANSYS的磁流变阻尼器设计技术研究[J].机械制造, 2006, 44(2):15-17 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxzz200602004Sun N, Zhang L, Tian L. Research on design of MR damper based on ANSYS[J]. Machinery, 2006, 44(2):15-17(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxzz200602004 [9] 瞿伟廉, 樊友川.磁流变液阻尼器的磁路有限元分析与优化设计方法[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版), 2006, 23(3):1-4 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/whcsjsxyxb200603001Qu W L, Fan Y C. Magnetic circuit finite element analysis and optimum design method of a MR damper[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Urban Science Edition), 2006, 23(3):1-4(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/whcsjsxyxb200603001 [10] 郭鹏飞, 关新春, 欧进萍.磁流变液阻尼器响应时间的试验研究及其动态磁场有限元分析[J].振动与冲击, 2009, 28(6):1-5, 16 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2009.06.001Guo P F, Guan X C, Ou J P. Experimental study and dynamic magnetic finite element analysis on the response time of magnetorheological fluid dampers[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2009, 28(6):1-5, 16(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2009.06.001 [11] 周云, 谭平.磁流变阻尼控制理论与技术[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007:38-39Zhou Y, Tan P. Magnetorheological damper control theory and technology[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2007:38-39(in Chinese) [12] 廖昌荣, 张红辉, 余淼, 等.磁流变液的流变学特性检测方法与仪器研究[J].仪器仪表学报, 2008, 29(12):2475-2479 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-3087.2008.12.003Liao C R, Zhang H H, Yu M, et al. Study on test methodology and instrument for rheological properties of magneto-rheological fluids[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2008, 29(12):2475-2479(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-3087.2008.12.003 [13] 田静, 倪卫国, 祝世兴.剪切阀式磁流变减震器磁路分析与仿真[J].液压与气动, 2015, (12):45-48 doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2015.12.009Tian J, Ni W G, Zhu S X. Magnetic circuit analysis and simulation of shear-valve mode magnetorheological damper[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2015, (12):45-48(in Chinese) doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2015.12.009 [14] Lord Corporation. MRF-132DG magneto-rheological fluid[EB/OL]. (2012-06-20). http://www.lord.com [15] 王宇飞, 何琳, 单树军.基于Maxwell的磁流变阻尼器的磁路有限元分析[J].噪声与振动控制, 2007, 27(2):28-32 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2007.02.008Wang Y F, He L, Shan S J. The finite element analysis based on Maxwell for magnetic circuit design of MR damper[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2007, 27(2):28-32(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2007.02.008 [16] 王宇飞, 何琳, 单树军.磁流变阻尼器响应时间的影响因素和优化途径研究[J].船海工程, 2006, 35(6):103-106 doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7953.2006.06.032Wang Y F, He L, Shan S J. Investigation on the influence factors and optimization approaches of MR dampers' response time[J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2006, 35(6):103-106(in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7953.2006.06.032