Study on Mechanical Behaviour of Spiral Drum under Complex Condition of Coal Seam
-
摘要: 为研究复杂煤层赋存条件下螺旋滚筒的力学行为,基于Drucker-Prager屈服准则构建出煤岩材料的本构模型。通过对螺旋滚筒截割过程进行了数值模拟,得到了煤岩体的应力分布、截齿以及螺旋滚筒的受力变化规律。在0°~12°范围内,随着倾斜角的增加,截齿受力均值增大了30.9%。牵引速度增大使得与截齿接触的煤岩体所积聚的弹性能量和脆性增加,煤、岩体应力最大增幅分别为40.1%和9.3%;螺旋滚筒转速降低使得与截齿接触的煤岩体应力有所降低,煤、岩体应力最大降幅分别为27.0%和7.5%。牵引速度增大及螺旋滚筒转速的降低使得三向力中牵引阻力的增幅最大,其最大增幅为91.73%。螺旋滚筒载荷大小及波动随截割对象性质不同而出现明显的变化。Abstract: In order to study the mechanical behaviour of spiral drum under complex condition of coal seam, the constitutive model for coal and rock materials was constructed based on Drucker-Prager yield criterion. Through the numerical simulation of the cutting process of spiral drum, the stress distribution of the coal and rock mass, the force variation law of the pick and the spiral drum are obtained. In the range of 0°~12°, the mean force of the cutting pick increases with the increasing of dip angle by 30.9%. The increase in traction speed led to the increase in elastic energy and brittleness accumulated in coal and rock mass contact with the cutting pick, and the maximum stress of coal and rock mass increased by 40.1% and 9.3%. The reduce in spiral drum speed led to a decrease in the stress of coal rock body in contact with the pick, and the maximum stress of coal and rock mass reduced by 27.0% and 7.5%. The increase in traction speed and the reduce in rotation speed of spiral drum caused the greatest increase in traction resistance among the three-way forces, with the maximum increased by 91.73%. The load and fluctuation of the spiral drum varied significantly with the nature of cutting object.
-
Key words:
- complex coal seam /
- spiral drum /
- mechanical behaviour /
- constitutive model /
- numerical simulation
-
表 1 相关材料参数属性
材料 密度/ (kg·m-3) 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 凝聚力/ MPa 坚固性系数 内摩擦角/ (°) 煤 1.32×103 4.112×103 0.23 1.45 1.9 58 岩 2.40×103 7.67×103 0.2 11.5 5.4 38 YG8 1.46×104 5.9×105 0.23 - - - 42CrMo 7.85×103 2.125×105 0.3 - - - 16Mn 7.85×103 2.187×105 0.3 - - - 表 2 不同倾角下截齿受力统计
kN 数值 倾斜角/(°) 0 3 8 12 15 最大值 59.814 59.337 61.658 63.645 33.217 最小值 0.103 0.382 0.450 0.754 0.641 平均值 4.479 7 4.618 9 5.288 7 5.865 4 3.891 6 表 3 岩体应力大小统计
MPa 速度/
(m·min-1)转速/(r·min-1) 60 70 80 90 100 2 55.78 54.91 53.12 52.67 51.96 3 57.51 56.28 55.34 54.38 53.17 4 59.03 58.37 57.53 56.75 55.39 5 59.32 58.54 57.57 57.12 56.76 6 59.46 58.85 58.05 56.97 55.95 表 4 煤体应力大小统计
MPa 速度/
(m·min-1)转速/(r·min-1) 60 70 80 90 100 2 6.91 6.42 6.18 5.89 5.73 3 7.85 7.39 6.94 6.23 5.73 4 8.74 8.21 7.88 6.95 6.44 5 8.89 8.43 8.23 7.73 7.09 6 8.94 8.82 8.66 7.80 7.46 表 5 螺旋滚筒受力波动系数
截割对象 波动系数/N 牵引阻力 截割阻力 侧向力 合力 顶板 0.293 4 0.648 1 0.089 6 0.537 1 底板 0.343 7 0.630 2 0.094 7 0.570 8 夹矸 0.295 1 0.617 6 0.096 3 0.526 4 顶底板 0.289 1 0.613 5 0.087 4 0.523 9 -
[1] 江红祥, 杜长龙, 刘送永.冲击速度对煤岩破碎能量和粒度分布的影响[J].煤炭学报, 2013, 38(4):604-609 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201304013Jiang H X, Du C L, Liu S Y. The effects of impact velocity on energy and size distribution of rock crushing[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(4):604-609(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201304013 [2] 赵丽娟, 田震, 刘旭南, 等.薄煤层采煤机滚筒载荷特性仿真分析[J].系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(12):3102-3108 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xtfzxb201512033Zhao L J, Tian Z, Liu X N, et al. Simulation analysis of load characteristic of thin seam shearer drum[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(12):3102-3108(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xtfzxb201512033 [3] Abu Bakar M Z, Gertsch L S. Evaluation of saturation effects on drag pick cutting of a brittle sandstone from full scale linear cutting tests[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 34:124-134 doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2012.11.009 [4] Mishra B. Analysis of cutting parameters and heat generation on bits of a continuous miner-using numerical and experimental approach[D]. West Virginia: College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, 2007 https://search.proquest.com/docview/304814614 [5] Su O, Akcin N A. Numerical simulation of rock cutting using the discrete element method[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(3):434-442 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.08.012 [6] 张倩倩, 韩振南, 张梦奇, 等.冲击载荷作用下锥形截齿磨损的试验和数值模拟研究[J].振动与冲击, 2016, 35(13):58-65 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201613010Zhang Q Q, Han Z N, Zhang M Q, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the wear of conical pick under impact load[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(13):58-65(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201613010 [7] 邬黔凤.采煤机截割滚筒结构参数的优化[D].太原: 太原理工大学, 2015 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y2797480Wu Q F. Structural parameter optimization for cutting drum of coal cutting machine[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2015(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y2797480 [8] 刘送永.采煤机滚筒截割性能及截割系统动力学研究[D].江苏徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2009 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10290-2010280013.htmLiu S Y. Research on cutting performance of shearer drum and cutting system dynamics[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2009(in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10290-2010280013.htm [9] 罗晨旭.滚筒采煤机开采含煤岩界面煤层截割特性研究[D].江苏徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2015 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10290-1015972363.htmLuo C X. Study on cutting characteristics of shearer mining coal seam with coal-rock interface[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2015(in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10290-1015972363.htm [10] Gao K D, Du C L, Fu L, et al. Effect of mining face angle on drum loading performance using discrete element method[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2014, 7(1):41-51. [11] 刘送永, 杜长龙, 崔新霞, 等.不同齿身锥度和合金头直径截齿的截割试验[J].煤炭学报, 2009, 34(9):1276-1280 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.09.026Liu S Y, Du C L, Cui X X, et al. Cutting experiment of the picks with different conicity and carbidetip diameters[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(9):1276-1280(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.09.026 [12] 赵丽娟, 何景强, 李发泉.刨煤机刨刀破煤过程的数值模拟[J].煤炭学报, 2012, 37(5):878-883 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201205030Zhao L J, He J Q, Li F Q. Numerical simulation of coal breaking process of plow bit[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(5):878-883(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201205030 [13] 郭辰光, 李源, 胡迪, 等.刨刀刨削煤岩特性数值模拟研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(2):141-145 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201702023.htmGuo C G, Li Y, Hu D, et al. Numerical simulation study on coal and rock ploughing and planing features of plough cutters[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2017, 45(2):141-145(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201702023.htm [14] 刘建庄, 郭立稳, 李建民, 等.矿用锚索预紧效应分析及锁定计算[J].煤炭学报, 2015, 40(2):293-300 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201502008Liu J Z, Guo L W, Li J M, et al. Pre-tightening effect of mine cable and its force calculation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2015, 40(2):293-300(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201502008 [15] 王峥荣, 熊晓燕, 张宏, 等.基于LS-DYNA采煤机镐型截齿截割有限元分析[J].振动、测试与诊断, 2010, 30(2):163-165 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6801.2010.02.014Wang Z R, Xiong X Y, Zhang H, et al. Study on conical pick cutting using LS-DYNA[J]. Journal of Vibration Measurement & Diagnosis, 2010, 30(2):163-165(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6801.2010.02.014 [16] 邓聪颖, 殷国富, 方辉, 等.基于正交试验的机床结合部动刚度优化配置[J].机械工程学报, 2015, 51(19):146-153 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxgcxb201519019Deng C Y, Yin G F, Fang H, et al. Optimal configuration of dynamic stiffness of machine tool joints based on orthogonal experiment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(19):146-153(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxgcxb201519019