Simulation and Analysis on Vertical Crash of Civil Aircraft Fuselage Section with Cargo Door
-
摘要: 建立了含货舱门的大型民机机身框段结构适坠性分析的全尺寸非线性有限元模型,模型中考虑了机身框、长桁、蒙皮、货舱及行李、客舱地板、客舱吊柜和座椅。利用该模型对机身框段进行了垂直坠撞仿真分析,坠撞速度为9.14 m/s,采用动力学软件MSC.Dytran进行求解,计算得到机身框段结构的变形和试验中各测量点处的加速度响应。计算结果与试验结果的吻合验证了所建模型的有效性。在该模型的基础上,对机身框段在不同滚转角垂直坠撞工况下的适坠性进行了分析。结果表明:在所计算的工况中,当飞机左滚12°和右滚8°坠撞时,机身结构破坏最严重,乘员承受的过载最大。货舱门结构增加了舱门侧的机身结构刚度,使机身结构左右变形不对称,含舱门侧的机身变形较小,含舱门侧的乘员承受过载较大。Abstract: A full-scale nonlinear finite element model (FEM) was developed to obtain the crash performance of civil aircraft fuselage section. The FEM included the cargo door structures, as well as the airframes, skins, luggages, overhead baggage bay and seats in cabin. The FEM was used to simulate the vertical crash of the aircraft fuselage section. The initial impact velocity of the fuselage section was 9.14 m/s. The FEM was solved in MSC.Dytran and exported the deformation results of the fuselage section and the acceleration of all the measure points defined in the corresponding experiments. The FEM was validated by the agreement of the simulation results and the experiments data. The dynamic responses of the fuselage section with different roll angles were calculated with the validated FEM in the same initial velocity. The simulation results show that the damage of fuselage structures was most severe and the overloads of the passengers were largest in both cases of roll left 12° and roll right 8°. The deformation of the right hand side (RHS) fuselage was smaller than the left hand side (LHS) fuselage because the stiffness of the RHS fuselage structures was increased by the cargo door structures. The overloads of passengers on the RHS seats were also larger than the LHS due to the cargo door structures.
-
Key words:
- acceleration /
- aircraft structural frames /
- calculations /
- computer simulation /
- computer software /
- crashworthiness /
- deformation
-
[1] 中国民用航空总局.CCAR-25-R4中国民用航空规章 第25部:运输类飞机适航标准[S].北京: 中国民用航空总局,2011 Civil Aviation Administration of China. CCAR-25-R4 China Civil Aviation Regulation Part 25-Airworthiness standards: Transport category airplanes[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China,2011 (in Chinese) [2] Zheng J, Xiang J, Luo Z, et al. Crashworthiness design of transport aircraft subfloor using polymer foams[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness,2011,16(4):375-383 [3] Abramowitz A, Smith T G, Vu T. Vertical drop test of a narrow-body transport fuselage section with a conformable auxiliary fuel tank onboard[R]. DOT/FAA/AR-00/56: Federal Aviation Administration,2000 [4] Abramowitz A, Smith T G, Vu T, et al. Vertical drop test of a narrow-body transport fuselage section with overhead stowage bins onboard[R]. DOT/FAA/AR-01/100, Federal Aviation Administration,2002 [5] Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. NASA langley research center impact dynamics research facility research survey[J]. Journal of Aircraft,2004,41(3):511-522 [6] Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Crash simulation of a vertical drop test of a commuter-class aircraft[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness,2005,10(2):173-182 [7] Jackson K E, Fasanella E L, Boitnott R L, et al. Full-scale crash test and finite element simulation of a composite prototype helicopter[R]. NASA TP-2003-212641,2003 [8] Fasanella E L, Jackson K E. Crash simulation of a vertical drop test of a B737 fuselage section with auxiliary fuel tank[R]. NASA 20040086067,2004 [9] Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Crash simulation of vertical drop tests of two boeing 737 fuselage sections[R]. DOT/FAA/AR-02/62, Federal Aviation Administration,2002 [10] Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Crash simulation of a vertical drop test of a b737 fuselage section with overhead bins and luggage[R]. NASA 20040086068,2004 [11] Byar A D. A crashworthiness study of a boeing 737 fuselage section[D]. Drexel University,2003 [12] Fasanella E L, Jackson K E. Best practices simulation for crash modeling and simulation[R]. NASA TM-2002-211944,2002 [13] 顾恒山,于哲峰,汪海.民机中央翼舱段适坠性仿真[J].固体力学学报,2011,32(S):182-187 Gu H S, Yu Z F, Wang H. Crashworthiness simulation of civil aircraft fuselage section with center wing[J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics,2011,32(S):182-187 (in Chinese) [14] 何欢,陈国平,张家滨.带油箱结构的机身框段坠撞仿真分析[J].航空学报,2008,29(3):627-633 He H, Chen G P, Zhang J B. Crash simulation of fuselage section with fuel tank[J]. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica,2008,29(3):627-633 (in Chinese) [15] 任毅如,向锦武,罗漳平,等.客舱地板斜撑杆对民机典型机身段耐撞性能的影响[J].航空学报,2010,31(2):271-276 Ren Y R, Xiang J W, Luo Z P, et al. Effect of cabin-floor oblique strut on crashworthiness of typical civil aircraft fuselage section [J]. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica,2010,31(2):271-276 (in Chinese) [16] 郑建强,向锦武,罗漳平,等.民机机身耐撞性设计的波纹板布局[J].航空学报,2010,31(7):1396-1402 Zheng J Q, Xiang J W, Luo Z P, et al. Crashworthiness layout of civil aircraft using waved-plate for energy absorption[J]. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica,2010,31(2):271-276 (in Chinese) [17] 马君峰,刘小川,周苏枫,等.民用飞机客舱地板下部吸能结构坠撞特性评估[J].机械科学与技术,2013,32(2):269-273 Ma J F, Liu X C, Zhou S F, et al. Crashworthiness of civil aircraft energy absorption sub-structure[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering,2013,32(2):269-273 (in Chinese) [18] 冯振宇,张晓敏,牟浩蕾,等.不同冲击条件对机身结构适坠性的影响[J].机械科学与技术,2013,32(3):353-357 Feng Z Y, Zhang X M, Mou H L, et al. Influences of different impact conditions on aircraft fuselage crashworthiness[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering,2013,32(3):353-357 (in Chinese)
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 102
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0