论文:2024,Vol:42,Issue(3):435-445
引用本文:
彭娅婷, 温祥西, 吴明功, 朱德山, 丁力. 基于复杂网络和MFIM-TOPSIS的飞行态势评估[J]. 西北工业大学学报
PENG Yating, WEN Xiangxi, WU Minggong, ZHU Deshan, DING Li. Flight situational assessment based on complex network and MFIM-TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University

基于复杂网络和MFIM-TOPSIS的飞行态势评估
彭娅婷1,2, 温祥西1,2, 吴明功1,2, 朱德山3, 丁力4
1. 空军工程大学 空管领航学院, 陕西 西安 710051;
2. 国家空管防相撞技术重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710051;
3. 中国人民解放军 93220部队, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150036;
4. 中国人民解放军 95605部队, 重庆 402360
摘要:
为了客观准确评估基于航迹运行(TBO)模式下空中飞行态势,提出了一种基于复杂网络和MFIM-TOPSIS的飞行态势评估方法。通过分析航空器间侧向碰撞风险建立不同机型的精准保护区,通过三维速度障碍法构建飞行冲突网络,贴近TBO空中运行环境,在此基础上选取总节点度、平均点强、网络密度等6个网络拓扑指标构建飞行态势评估指标体系。为弱化评估主观性影响,提出了一种能反映主观因素-客观因素的相互作用矩阵,采用最大信息系数对相互作用矩阵编码进行改进,通过优劣解距离法评估飞行态势等级状况。仿真分析和高崎机场实例分析结果均表明:该评估模型能够准确评估空中飞行态势,能为管制员决策指挥提供辅助信息。
关键词:    复杂网络    飞行冲突网络    飞行态势评估    优劣解距离法    多因素相互作用矩阵   
Flight situational assessment based on complex network and MFIM-TOPSIS
PENG Yating1,2, WEN Xiangxi1,2, WU Minggong1,2, ZHU Deshan3, DING Li4
1. Air Traffic Control and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China;
2. National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Collision Prevention, Xi'an 710051, China;
3. Unit 93220 of the PLA, Harbin 150036, China;
4. Unit 95605 of the PLA, Chongqing 402360, China
Abstract:
In order to objectively and accurately assess the airborne flight posture in the trajectory-based operation (TBO) mode, a flight posture assessment method based on complex network and MFIM-TOPSIS is proposed. Firstly, the precise protection zone of different aircraft types is established by analyzing the risk of lateral collision between aircraft, and the flight conflict network is constructed by using the three-dimensional velocity barrier method, which is close to the TBO air operation environment, based on which six network topology indexes, such as total node degree, average point strength and network density, are selected to build the flight attitude assessment index system. To weaken the influence of the assessment subjectivity, an interaction matrix that can reflect subjective factors-objective factors is proposed. The maximum information coefficient is used to improve the coding of interaction matrix. Finally the flight attitude level status is assessed by using the superiority-disadvantage solution distance method. The simulation analysis and the example analysis of Takasaki Airport show that the evaluation model can accurately assess the air traffic situation and provide auxiliary information for controllers' decision making and command.
Key words:    flight conflict network    complex network    flight situational assessment    superior-disadvantage solution distance method    multi-factor interaction matrix   
收稿日期: 2023-06-13     修回日期:
DOI: 10.1051/jnwpu/20244230435
通讯作者: 温祥西(1984—) e-mail:wxxajy@163.com     Email:wxxajy@163.com
作者简介: 彭娅婷(1995—),硕士研究生
相关功能
PDF(2301KB) Free
打印本文
把本文推荐给朋友
作者相关文章
彭娅婷  在本刊中的所有文章
温祥西  在本刊中的所有文章
吴明功  在本刊中的所有文章
朱德山  在本刊中的所有文章
丁力  在本刊中的所有文章

参考文献:
[1] ICAO. Global air traffic management operational concept[R]. DOC 5848-AN458, 2005
[2] BENTRUP L, HOFFMANN M. Free routing airspace in Europe[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, 2016
[3] 陈秀真, 郑庆华, 管晓宏, 等. 网络化系统安全态势评估的研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2004, 38(4): 76-80 CHEN Xiuzhen, ZHENG Qinghua, GUAN Xiaohong, et al. Research on security posture assessment of networked systems[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2004, 38(4): 76-80(in Chinese)
[4] BRONSVOORT J, ZISSERMANN P, BARRY S, et al. A framework for assessing and managing the impact of ANSP actions on flight efficiency[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2015, 23(1): 29-53
[5] 欧韬, 周长春. 基于神经网络的民航安全态势评估模型及仿真[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(2): 34-41 OU Tao, ZHOU Changchun. Neural network-based civil aviation security situation assessment model and simulation[J]. China Production Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 7(2): 34-41(in Chinese)
[6] 杜婧涵, 胡明华, 张魏宁, 等. 基于度量学习的机场交通态势弱监督评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学报, 2023, 49(7): 1772-1778 DU Jinghan, HU Minghua, ZHANG Weining, et al. Weakly supervised assessment of airport traffic posture based on metric learning[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(7): 1772-1778(in Chinese)
[7] XIAO M M, ZHANG J, CAI K Q, et al. ATCEM: a synthetic model for evaluating air traffic complexity[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2016, 50(3): 315-325
[8] JIANG X R, WEN X X, WU M G. A complex network analysis approach for identifying air traffic congestion based on independent component analysis[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 523(1): 364-381
[9] 吴明功, 王泽坤, 甘旭升, 等. 基于复杂网络理论的关键飞行冲突点识别[J].西北工业大学学报, 2020, 38(2): 279-287 WU Minggong, WANG Zekun, GAN Xusheng, et al. Identification of critical flight conflict points based on complex network theory[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(2): 279-287(in Chinese)
[10] 吴明功, 叶泽龙, 温祥西, 等. 基于复杂网络的空中交通复杂性识别方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(5): 839-850 WU Minggong, YE Zelong, WEN Xiangxi, et al. A complex network-based method for air traffic complexity identification[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(5): 839-850(in Chinese)
[11] 毕可心, 吴明功, 温祥西, 等. 基于速度障碍法的飞行冲突网络建模与分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2163-2173 BI Kexin, WU Minggong, WEN Xiangxi, et al. Modeling and analysis of flight conflict network based on velocity barrier method[J]. System Engineering and Electronic Technology, 2021, 43(8): 2163-2173(in Chinese)
[12] 赵嶷飞, 史永亮. 基于模糊综合评价的航路交通态势评估[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2011, 29(1): 5-8 ZHAO Yifei, SHI Yongliang. Traffic situation assessment of airways based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2011, 29(1): 5-8(in Chinese)
[13] 赵小林, 曾冲寒, 薛静锋, 等. 基于TOPSIS的多维网络安全度量模型研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2021, 41(3): 311-321 ZHAO Xiaolin, ZENG Chonghan, XUE Jingfeng, et al. Research on multidimensional network security measurement model based on TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021, 41(3): 311-321(in Chinese)
[14] 胡涛, 王栋, 姜龙亭, 等. 基于改进MGM(1,N)轨迹预测的空战态势评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2020, 27(11): 39-44 HU Tao, WANG Dong, JIANG Longting, et al. Air combat posture assessment based on improved MGM(1,N) trajectory prediction[J]. Electro-Optics and Control, 2020, 27(11): 39-44(in Chinese)
[15] 李昂, 聂党民, 温祥西, 等. 基于相依网络和SVM的管制系统运行态势评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(5): 1287-1294 LI Ang, NIE Dangmin, WEN Xiangxi, et al. Operational situation assessment of control system based on dependent network and SVM[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1287-1294(in Chinese)
[16] 温祥西, 林福根, 吴明功, 等. 基于复杂网络和朴素贝叶斯的飞行态势评估[J]. 飞行力学, 2023, 41(1): 86-94 WEN Xiangxi, LIN Fugen, WU Minggong, et al. Flight situation assessment based on complex networks and plain Bayes[J]. Flight Mechanics, 2023, 41(1): 86-94(in Chinese)
[17] CLINTON J D, JACKMAN S D, RIVERS D. The statistical analysis of roll call data[J]. American Political Science Review, 2003, 98(2): 355-370
[18] MOEK G, LUTZ E, MOSBERG W. Risk assessment of RNP 10 and RVSM in the south Atlantic flight identification regions[R]. MD21401-7465, 2001
[19] 王欣, 徐肖豪. 空中飞机侧向间隔标准的初步研究[J]. 中国民航学院学报, 2001, 19(1): 1-5 WANG Xin, XU Xiaohao. A preliminary study of lateral separation criteria for airplanes[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation College of China, 2001, 19(1): 1-5(in Chinese)
[20] BROOKER P. Longitudinal collision risk for ATC track systems: a hazardous' event model[J]. Journal of Navigation, 2006, 59(1): 55-70
[21] ICAO. Convention on International Civil Aviation[R]. DOC 7300, 2006
[22] LIANG Y, HE W, ZHONG W, et al. Objective reduction particle swarm optimizer based on maximal information coefficient for many-objective problems[J]. Neurocomputing, 2018, 281: 1-11
[23] LI H W, JAMES L. A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment[J].Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2018, 73: 684-696
[24] ROWE G, WRIGHT G. The delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2013, 15(4): 353-375