论文:2018,Vol:36,Issue(4):715-721
引用本文:
谢松云, 李亚兵, 王伟, 孟雅, 谢辛舟. 基于行为学的无人机操作员认知状态评估[J]. 西北工业大学学报
Xie Songyun, Li Yabing, Wang Wei, Meng Ya, Xie Xinzhou. Assessment of UAV's Operator Cognitive State Based on Behavior Signals[J]. Northwestern polytechnical university

基于行为学的无人机操作员认知状态评估
谢松云, 李亚兵, 王伟, 孟雅, 谢辛舟
西北工业大学 电子信息学院, 陕西 西安 710072
摘要:
为探索无人机操作员的精神或认知状态与警觉度测试度量准则的关系,研究不同准则的应用环境,建立基于行为信号的警觉度评价方法。设置了不同条件下经典的警觉度防撞击实验,记录实验过程中被试的主观评分和响应时间、错误率等行为学信号。通过统计学方法分析实验过程中行为参数的动态变化。结果表明:相比于连续性任务,间歇性任务下被试的主观精神负载显著降低;相比于其他度量准则,响应速率更能反映被试的精神状态的动态变化;相比于平均响应时间,Q-50对极值具有更高的鲁棒性;当被试警觉度状态较高或较低时,Q-10和Q-90的变化范围较小或不变。
关键词:    无人机    警觉度    行为信号    度量准则    实验设计    统计学方法   
Assessment of UAV's Operator Cognitive State Based on Behavior Signals
Xie Songyun, Li Yabing, Wang Wei, Meng Ya, Xie Xinzhou
School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
Abstract:
For exploring the relationship between the mental or cognitive state and metric of vigilance test for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), a vigilance state evaluation method and sphere of application based on behavior signals is established. A classical vigilance test avoiding to crash is set. During the experiments, the subjective ratings as well as behavior signals (Response Time, Lapse) are recording. The dynamic changing of behavior signals is analyzed using statistical analysis. The results demonstrate that compared with continuous PVT test, the subject's mental workload in rest PVT test decreases dramatically. Compared other metrics, the speed of response time can reflect the dynamic changing of subject's mental state. The metric of Q-50 has a strong robustness for outlier of subject. Considering that the metrics have strong correlation with operator's cognitive state, they can effectively analyze the different workload.
Key words:    unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV)    vigilance    behavior signals    metric    design of experiments    statistical analysis   
收稿日期: 2017-05-20     修回日期:
DOI:
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61273250)、中德联合脑机交互与脑控技术国际联合研究中心(3102017jc11002)以及西北工业大学研究生创意创新种子基金(Z2017141)资助
通讯作者:     Email:
作者简介: 谢松云(1968-),女,西北工业大学教授、博士生导师,主要从事脑认知与脑机接口、动态目标识别与跟踪研究。
相关功能
PDF(1397KB) Free
打印本文
把本文推荐给朋友
作者相关文章
谢松云  在本刊中的所有文章
李亚兵  在本刊中的所有文章
王伟  在本刊中的所有文章
孟雅  在本刊中的所有文章
谢辛舟  在本刊中的所有文章

参考文献:
[1] Nelson J T, Mckinley R A, Golob E J, et al. Enhancing Vigilance in Operators with Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation(tDCS)[J]. Neuroimage, 2014, 85(15):909-917
[2] 赵云龙,王学民,薛然婷,等. 基于复杂性度量的大脑警觉度分析[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2015(4):725-729 Zhao Yunlong, Wang Xueming, Xue Ranting, et al. Brain Vigilance Analysis Based on the Measure of Complexity[J]. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2015(4):725-729(in Chinese)
[3] 高振海,段立飞,赵会,等. 基于生理信号的多任务下驾驶员认知负荷的评定[J]. 汽车工程, 2015(1):33-37 Gao Zhenhai, Duan Lifei, Zhao Hui, et al. Assessment of Driver's Cognitive Workload under Multitask Based on Physiological Signals[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2015(1):33-37(in Chinese)
[4] Hart G S, Stavenland E L. Development of NASA-TLX(Task Load Index):Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research[J]. Advances in Psychology, 1988, 52:139-183
[5] Zhang X, Li J, Liu Y, et al. Design of a Fatigue Detection System for High-Speed Trains Based on Driver Vigilance Using a Wireless Wearable EEG[J]. Sensors, 2017, 17(3):486
[6] Shimomura Y, Yoda T, Sugiura K, et al. Use of Frequency Domain Analysis of Skin Conductance for Evaluation of Mental Workload[J]. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 2008, 27(4):173
[7] Joux N R D, Wilson K, Russell P N, et al. The Configural Properties of Task Stimuli DO Influence Vigilance Performance[J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2015, 233(9):2619-2626
[8] Davis C M, Roma P G, Hienz R D. A Rodent Model of the Human Psychomotor Vigilance Test:Performance Comparisons[J]. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2016, 259(3):57-71
[9] Whelan R. Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data[J]. Psychological Record, 2008, 58(3):475-482
[10] Basner M, Mcguire S, Goel N, et al. A New Likelihood Ratio Metric for the Psychomotor Vigilance Test and Its Sensitivity to Sleep Loss[J]. Journal of Sleep Research, 2015, 24(6):702-713