Seat Comfort Characterization by Body-seat Interface Pressure Distribution
-
摘要: 对人-椅界面体压分布指标、计算方法及其表征进行阐述,将体压分布指标分为基本指标、静态指标和动态指标3类。其中静态指标包括座椅压力分布SPD%、圆型压力梯度GC以及线型压力梯度GT,动态指标包括动态座椅压力分布DSPD%、压力变化率均方根Pcrms以及区域压力变化率aPcrms。通过不同曲面造型及不同硬度坐垫的体压分布实验研究,结果表明:GC、GT以及SPD%与座椅舒适度成线性关系,GC与GT值越小,坐骨结节处越舒适,SPD%值越小则座椅整体舒适度评价越高;曲面下凹适中的坐垫比平坦的坐垫较舒适;最大压力Pm以及SPD%可以明显的表征坐垫材料的软硬度,硬坐垫的Pm、SPD%值较大,但是当被试体重过大,超过一定的阈值后,SPD%表征材料软硬度的能力失效。Abstract: The parameter,calculation method and characterization of body-seat interface pressure distribution are expounded. The body pressure distribution parameter is divided into basic parameter,static parameter and dynamic parameter. Static parameter includes seat pressure distribution(SPD%),circular pressure gradient(GC) and transverse pressure gradient(GT). Dynamic parameter includes dynamic seat pressure distribution(DSPD%),pressure change rate root-mean-square(Pcrms) and area pressure change rate(aPcrms). By testing on the different surface molding and different hardness of seat foam,the result shows that there is a liner relation between GC,GT,SPD% and seat comfort. The smaller value GCor GTis,the more comfortable of ischial tuberosity area occupant feels. The smaller value SPD% is,the more comfortable of overall buttocks occupant feels. The moderate concave surface molding is more comfort than flat surface molding. The maximum pressure(Pm) and SPD% can characterize the hardness of seat foam obviously. Hard seat foam has higher Pmand SPD% value. But SPD% can't reflect the hardness of seat foam if the weight of occupant is too large.
-
Key words:
- body pressure distribution parameter /
- calculations /
- experiments /
- pressure distribution
-
[1] Shackel B,Chidsey K D,Shipley P. The assessment ofchair comfort[J]. Ergonomics,1969,12(2):269-306 [2] Helander M G,Sara S J,Drury C G,et al. An ergonomicevaluation of office chairs[J]. Technology and People,1987,3(3):247-263 [3] 铃木浩明. 列车舒适度的评价[J]. 国外铁道车辆,1999,(2):26-32Hiroaki S. Evaluation of train comfort[J]. ForeignRolling Stock,1999,(2):26-32 (in Chinese) [4] 马佳,柯以杰,苏强,等. 汽车座椅舒适度人工智能评价方法研究[J]. 机械科学与技术,2011,30 (3):419-322Ma J,Ke Y J,Su Q,et al. An automobile seat comfortevaluating method based on artificial intelligence [J].Mechanical Science and Technology for AerospaceEngineering,2011,30(3):419-322 (in Chinese) [5] 陈祥. 高速铁路客车乘坐舒适度综合评价模型研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2010Chen X. Research of comprehensive evaluation modelon riding comfort of high-speed train[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2010 (in Chinese) [6] De Looze M P,Kuijt-evers L F,Van D J. Sitting comfortand siscomfort and the relationships with objectivemeasures[J]. Ergonomics,2003,46(10):985-997 [7] Niels C C M Moes. Variation in sitting pressuredistribution and location of the points of maximumpressure with rotation of the pelvis,gender and bodycharacteristics[J]. Ergonomics,2007,50(4):536-561 [8] 徐明,夏群生. 体压分布的指标[J]. 中国机械工程,1997,8(1):65-68Xu M,Xia Q S. The parameters of body pressuredistribution on seat[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,1997,8(1):65-68 (in Chinese) [9] Kazushige E,Michael J. Factors affecting static seatcushion comfort[J]. Ergonomics,2001,44 (10 ):901-921 [10] Seokhee N,Sunghyun L,Hwa-soon C,et al. Evaluationof driver's discomfort and postural change using dynamicbody pressure distribution[J]. Industrial Ergonomics,2005,35(12):1085-1096 [11] Ahmadian M,Seigler T M,Clapper D,et al. Alternativetest method for long term dynamic effects of vehicleseat[R]. SAE Tchnical Paper,2002-01-3082,2002 [12] Koro U,Katsunori F,Hitoshi L. A seat ride evaluationmethod for transient vibrations[R]. SAE Tchnical Paper2001-01-0641,2001
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 193
- HTML全文浏览量: 37
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0